Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
My point exactly, only extreme cases of animal cruelty make it to the news.Tad Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have you watched the news latelyEvery day there is a new story of some terable thing that has happened to kids by their parents or foster parents...TadCherie A Gabbert wrote: I would love to, the only problem is, one voice does not amount to a hill of beans. As you can see from this topic not alot of people percieve animals and kids as one in the same. Cherie"Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How about changing the laws to agree with that...At 01:31 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>In MY mind animals and kids are one and the same and SHOULD be thought of >EQUALLY, but I know this will never be, it is just how I put certain >scenerios in perspective.>Cherie>>>"Gloria B. Lane" wrote:>If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have>"breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city>organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they>wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not>as much. And people might care more.>>Gloria>>At 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>>> >Cherie A Gabbert wrote:Put kids in place of the> >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail,> >but instead working with other kids?> >> >Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave> >"animals" just where it is...> >> >I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language.> >> >Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals &> >children...well, they are the lowest of the low.> >> >I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she> >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a> >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for> >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her> >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're> >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break> >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all> >yourself..you'll show them> >> >I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to> >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the> >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown?> >> >The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all.>Have a purrfect day>Cherie> Have a purrfect day Cherie Have a purrfect day Cherie
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
Have you watched the news latelyEvery day there is a new story of some terable thing that has happened to kids by their parents or foster parents... Tad Cherie A Gabbert wrote: I would love to, the only problem is, one voice does not amount to a hill of beans. As you can see from this topic not alot of people percieve animals and kids as one in the same. Cherie "Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How about changing the laws to agree with that... At 01:31 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote: >In MY mind animals and kids are one and the same and SHOULD be thought of >EQUALLY, but I know this will never be, it is just how I put certain >scenerios in perspective. >Cherie > > >"Gloria B. Lane" wrote: >If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have >"breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city >organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they >wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not >as much. And people might care more. > >Gloria > >At 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote: > > > >Cherie A Gabbert wrote:Put kids in place of the > >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail, > >but instead working with other kids? > > > >Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave > >"animals" just where it is... > > > >I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language. > > > >Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals & > >children...well, they are the lowest of the low. > > > >I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she > >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a > >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for > >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her > >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're > >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break > >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all > >yourself..you'll show them > > > >I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to > >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the > >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown? > > > >The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all. > > > > >Have a purrfect day >Cherie > Have a purrfect day Cherie
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
I would love to, the only problem is, one voice does not amount to a hill of beans. As you can see from this topic not alot of people percieve animals and kids as one in the same. Cherie"Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How about changing the laws to agree with that...At 01:31 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>In MY mind animals and kids are one and the same and SHOULD be thought of >EQUALLY, but I know this will never be, it is just how I put certain >scenerios in perspective.>Cherie>>>"Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have>"breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city>organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they>wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not>as much. And people might care more.>>Gloria>>At 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>>> >Cherie A Gabbert wrote:Put kids in place of the> >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail,> >but instead working with other kids?> >> >Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave> >"animals" just where it is...> >> >I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language.> >> >Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals &> >children...well, they are the lowest of the low.> >> >I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she> >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a> >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for> >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her> >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're> >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break> >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all> >yourself..you'll show them> >> >I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to> >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the> >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown?> >> >The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all.>Have a purrfect day>Cherie>Have a purrfect day Cherie
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
How about changing the laws to agree with that... At 01:31 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote: In MY mind animals and kids are one and the same and SHOULD be thought of EQUALLY, but I know this will never be, it is just how I put certain scenerios in perspective. Cherie "Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have "breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not as much. And people might care more. Gloria At 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote: >Cherie A Gabbert wrote:Put kids in place of the >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail, >but instead working with other kids? > >Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave >"animals" just where it is... > >I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language. > >Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals & >children...well, they are the lowest of the low. > >I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all >yourself..you'll show them > >I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown? > >The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all. Have a purrfect day Cherie
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
In MY mind animals and kids are one and the same and SHOULD be thought of EQUALLY, but I know this will never be, it is just how I put certain scenerios in perspective. Cherie "Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have "breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not as much. And people might care more.GloriaAt 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>Cherie A Gabbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:Put kids in place of the >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail, >but instead working with other kids?>>Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave >"animals" just where it is...>>I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language.>>Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals & >children...well, they are the lowest of the low.>>I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all >yourself..you'll show them>>I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown?>>The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all.Have a purrfect day Cherie
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
People, as a whole, are generally flawed. So obsessed with their individual concerns, and of course amassing wealth and possesions...Our own government is working hard to eliminate social programs that, while abused by some, feed, house, cloth, teach, and give health care for childrenWe fund schools based on test scores, spending more money where the scores are higher because those children have more "potenial" thereby fulfilling our own prophacy by declaring that those who did not score well never had the potential to begin with. Well, Einstein failed algebra. People don't care about people...I'm not certain we'll ever get them to care about animals. I guess we just have to keep screaming into the wind and hoping SOMEONE in the future will hear."Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have "breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not as much. And people might care more.GloriaAt 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:>Cherie A Gabbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:Put kids in place of the >animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail, >but instead working with other kids?>>Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave >"animals" just where it is...>>I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language.>>Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals & >children...well, they are the lowest of the low.>>I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she >had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a >problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for >the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her >head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're >nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break >your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all >yourself..you'll show them>>I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to >proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the >by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown?>>The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Please read this response!! URGENT-KittyKind -CAT RESCUE-in Orange, NJ]
If you put "kids" in place of "animals', well - you wouldn't have "breeders" (uh in the way that we do for cats), they wouldn't have a city organization devoted to euthanizing (sometimes inhumainely), or they wouldn't be running loose on the street clawing thru the garbage - well not as much. And people might care more. Gloria At 12:30 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote: Cherie A Gabbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Put kids in place of the animals and think about it that way, would you want her not going to jail, but instead working with other kids? Ah...no..you'll get the more emotional response from me if you leave "animals" just where it is... I love kids too, but at least they can speak up in the same language. Trust mepeople who delibertly or through ignorance hurt animals & children...well, they are the lowest of the low. I DO believe she should be punished...and it never occured to me that she had done something delibertly to hasten their deaths, but fixing a problem, or trying too does more in the long run than just punishing for the acts... This woman is prob. a "collector" who got in over her head...then who do you go too? Your friends and family think you're nuts...just "get rid of them, they're ONLY animals..." but it would break your heart to do so, no one understands so you'll just do it all yourself..you'll show them I believe she needs therapy first...then it can be decided HOW to proceed...were the acts intentional...out of frustrationor the by-product of over empathy that turned into a logic & reality breakdown? The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. God help us all.
