Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: At

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: [..] May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the FFmpeg test system

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Nicolas George
Le duodi 22 fructidor, an CCXXII, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the FFmpeg test system on it. I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 4,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-05 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much how it is created,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-05 Thread Nicolas George
L'octidi 18 fructidor, an CCXXII, wm4 a écrit : And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git repos, one for each lib.) That is a terrible idea. We already have too many difficulties maintaining binaries

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Reinhard On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread wm4
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 9/4/2014 4:33 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: So the promise given in https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html doesn't hold anymore? Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git? Guilty party here. I kinda just neglected it because

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread wm4
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:23:12PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Iam not saying

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Reinhard On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, wm4 nfx...@googlemail.com wrote: And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git repos, one for each lib.) That idea seems very interesting to me. If coordinated and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:42:00PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Reinhard On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication with existing

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at least I got it to build. you could try

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at least I got it to build. As

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On 04.09.2014, at 05:33, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On

[FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at least I got it to build. As requested, the patch I used is attached. It’s not optimal as the arch could use