Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread John Comeau
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-01-01 17:02 GMT+01:00 John Comeau <j...@unternet.net>: >> nasm version 2.11.05, which is current in Debian stable. I could use >> 2.12.01 from sid, but should that be a requirement?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2017-01-01 Thread John Comeau
nasm version 2.11.05, which is current in Debian stable. I could use 2.12.01 from sid, but should that be a requirement? On 1/1/17, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 January 2017 at 07:52, John Comeau <j...@unternet.net> wrote: > >> fixes `oper

[FFmpeg-devel] PATCH for building with nasm

2016-12-31 Thread John Comeau
fixes `operation size not specified` errors as described here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36854583/compiling-ffmpeg-for-kali-linux-2 I rebuilt again with yasm and made sure it didn't break that. -- John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unternet.net http://jc.unternet.net/ "A place for every

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for Sricam, Floureon, etc. IP cameras

2016-12-31 Thread John Comeau
right, you can ignore that, I meant to snip it from the patch. sorry about that. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 6:05 AM, compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:32:06 -0800 > John Comeau <j...@unternet.net> wrote: > >> diff --git a/TODO.txt b/TODO.txt >&

[FFmpeg-devel] patch for Sricam, Floureon, etc. IP cameras

2016-12-30 Thread John Comeau
these cameras return `Transport: RTP/AVP` for a SETUP request of RTP/AVP/TCP, yet they only use TCP transport. `make check` still passes after patch. -- John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unternet.net http://jc.unternet.net/ "A place for everything, and everything all over the place" diff --git