Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] V2 tests/fate/filter-audio.mak: add test for ATEMPO audio filter

2024-03-28 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 1:52 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > atempo uses floats for processing, are you sure this > will produce > > exactly the same results everywhere? Tried replicating in some available environments I had and it worked fine, though could not relate with the test not working

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] V2 tests/fate/filter-audio.mak: add test for ATEMPO audio filter

2024-03-26 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 3:43 PM, Rajiv Harlalka wrote: > Please find an updated patch for tests on the atempo audio filter > Bumping this patch up for visibility. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/li

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] V2 tests/fate/filter-audio.mak: add test for ATEMPO audio filter

2024-03-21 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
Please find an updated patch for tests on the atempo audio filter From 30475d6f076d5236ee534002fffb01958ef0dfc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rajiv Harlalka Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:35:29 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2] tests/fate/filter-audio.mak: add test for ATEMPO audio filter Signed-off

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] tests/fate/filter-audio.mak: add test for ATEMPO audio filter

2024-03-21 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
Signed-off-by: Rajiv Harlalka --- tests/fate/filter-audio.mak | 3 ++ tests/ref/fate/filter-atempo | 70 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-atempo diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-audio.mak b/tests/fate/filter

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi/atempo: avoid asendcmd assertion failure

2024-03-13 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
On 3/13/24 8:39 AM, Pavel Koshevoy wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Pavel Koshevoy wrote: From: Rajiv Harlalka Check for zeros equal to the total samples early, because in that case we would already be leaving the first few frames out. Fixes trac ticket #10692 --- libavfilter

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] af_tempo.c: fix checking of samples and zero frame counts

2024-03-12 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
On 3/8/24 4:34 AM, Rajiv Harlalka wrote: Check for zeros equal to the total samples early, because in case the check is true we would already be leaving the first few frames out. Signed-off-by: Rajiv Harlalka #10692 ---  libavfilter/af_atempo.c | 13 ++---  1 file changed, 6 insertions

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] af_tempo.c: fix checking of samples and zero frame counts

2024-03-07 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
Check for zeros equal to the total samples early, because in case the check is true we would already be leaving the first few frames out. Signed-off-by: Rajiv Harlalka #10692 --- libavfilter/af_atempo.c | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] af_tempo.c: fix checking of samples and zero frame counts

2024-03-07 Thread Rajiv Harlalka
Check for zeros equal to the total samples early, because in case the check is true we would already be leaving the first few frames out. Signed-off-by: Rajiv Harlalka #10692 --- libavfilter/af_atempo.c | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavfilter