Romain,
Thank you for the clarity.
I approved. Will push in ~48 hours if there is no more concerns here.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Hi Romain,
My pleasure and thanks for contributing this change.
I was just wanting to know on this line (tagged in PR comments), if
there are scenarios
where we may only get one of these blocks on segment change and if we need to
also emit it to extradata.
```
if (priv->header && priv->comment &&
20327 is merged, thanks.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 1:24 PM Yalda wrote:
>
> Romain,
>
> Thank you for the clarity.
> I approved. Will push in ~48 hours if there is no more concerns here.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscr
Hello,
Apologies for the delay.
I have been testing #20327 today with various samples (local, online)
and the api-dump-stream-meta-test tool to observe metadata changes
while listening.
Code looks good, and to me it seems Romain addressed concerns.
I think it makes sense to drop the header packet
Thanks Romain. I am experimenting with this and trying the patches.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:46 AM Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
> Le mer. 13 août 2025 à 08:44, Romain Beauxis
> a écrit :
> >
> > Le mar. 12 août 2025 à 14:49, Romain Beauxis
> > a écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Le mar. 12 août
