On 9/14/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:42:59PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
>> ---
>> libavcodec/h264_parser.c | 22
Hi!
2016-09-14 19:35 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> I see nothing wrong doing this in parser instead of in generic code.
I am not saying there is anything wrong.
I wanted to share my suspicion that this patch is a work-around
for a bug that affects h.264 decoding in general.
(And
On 9/14/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-14 18:11 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>>> > Adopted from
2016-09-14 18:11 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> 2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> > Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
>>
>> I am of course not against this patch
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol >:
> > Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
>
> I am of course not against this patch but wasn't the reason for the
>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:42:59PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavcodec/h264_parser.c | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
I am of course not against this patch but wasn't the reason for the
old code in utils.c that our h264 parser has insufficiencies?
Carl Eugen
Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert.
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
---
libavcodec/h264_parser.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_parser.c b/libavcodec/h264_parser.c
index 615884f..cf6c3d1 100644