On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:32 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-13):
> > dear patch iam ashamed but iam not actually blocking you.
>
> What was blocking this patch is that the bug had not been properly
> analyzed and a review process was in progress, slowed down by Paul's
Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-13):
> dear patch iam ashamed but iam not actually blocking you.
What was blocking this patch is that the bug had not been properly
analyzed and a review process was in progress, slowed down by Paul's own
refusal of providing the info his has (most likely because
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 6:00 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:19:57PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> >
> 在 2023年11月14日，上午1:45，Sean McGovern 写道：
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 11:59 Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:19:57PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Michael Niedermayer <
>> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Nov 12,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 11:59 Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:19:57PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:19:57PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > > > Nice victimization, but "i'm behaving poorly because
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > > Nice victimization, but "i'm behaving poorly because the other person
> is a
> > > meanie" is a childish argument
> >
> > Mock
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > Nice victimization, but "i'm behaving poorly because the other person is a
> > meanie" is a childish argument
>
> Mock all your want, the fact that you attacked me even though I was just
>
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> Nice victimization, but "i'm behaving poorly because the other person is a
> meanie" is a childish argument
Mock all your want, the fact that you attacked me even though I was just
replying and not even told Paul to stop his childish games proves you
are biassed
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-12):
> So all this time you play arrogant moves and expect something out of
> nothing but just posting cryptic text.
“Out of nothing”? What does that even mean? It is a collaboration: you
do not share because I want it but because it helps your own goal.
> The case can be
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 7:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> > I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
>
> Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday.
>
> I am still expecting you to share the test cases you have so that the
> bug can
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 2:04 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > I said don't reply to me!
>
> Fortunately you have no authority over me.
>
I said that to avoid ridiculing yourself any more
> > I'm not biased,
>
> You are. In this message
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> I said don't reply to me!
Fortunately you have no authority over me.
> I'm not biased,
You are. In this message again.
> reread what you wrote and think
> if "pacifier" belongs on a technical
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:42 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming.
> You
> > can ask for more time in a kinder manner.
> > No, don't reply to me with insults or excuses, just take a walk outside
> and
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming. You
> can ask for more time in a kinder manner.
> No, don't reply to me with insults or excuses, just take a walk outside and
> reflect on your mistakes.
Address your reproaches to the person
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> > I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
>
> Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday
>
No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming. You
can
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday.
I am still expecting you to share the test cases you have so that the
bug can be properly fixed.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:22 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-08):
> > I did. I simplified it right from start. But I kept it for myself as It
> is
> > not really relevant.
>
> It is very relevant for reproducing the problem and reviewing the patch.
> Please show what you have,
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-08):
> I did. I simplified it right from start. But I kept it for myself as It is
> not really relevant.
It is very relevant for reproducing the problem and reviewing the patch.
Please show what you have, it will save time.
> With this pace of your debugging it can be
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 5:53 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> I have now been able to set up a reasonable test case with limit
> memoryuse 600M. Next step is to simplify the test case.
>
> (I cannot understand how you can pretend you analyzed the bug when your
> test case contains unrelated filters
I have now been able to set up a reasonable test case with limit
memoryuse 600M. Next step is to simplify the test case.
(I cannot understand how you can pretend you analyzed the bug when your
test case contains unrelated filters like hqdn3d or setsar.)
--
Nicolas George
Sean McGovern (12023-11-07):
> This is really unfair to Paul to let this drag on for so long.
What does fair have to do with this? If there is a bug, it has been
there for years, it can be there for a few more months without any
drawback. Plus, Paul has the patch that makes the bug disappear in
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023, 16:50 Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-07):
> > Will apply in next 48h.
>
> So, you are again threatening to violate the project's policy.
>
> > Libavfilter code is not so complex to need so big time interval for
> review
> > from experienced C developer.
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-07):
> Will apply in next 48h.
So, you are again threatening to violate the project's policy.
> Libavfilter code is not so complex to need so big time interval for review
> from experienced C developer.
First, the issue is not only analyzing the code but first finding
Will apply in next 48h.
Libavfilter code is not so complex to need so big time interval for review
from experienced C developer.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe,
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-07):
> To better explain the case at hand, there is no developer policy that lets
> you request an indefinite amount of review time with a single "No, you are
> not" message.
There is a policy that maintainers review patches and patches are not
pushed when somebody
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:44 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > Correct, it's you trying to win arguments with aggressive communication
>
> No. You came into an argument without knowing the first thing about it
> and you decided to side with the guy who wants to
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> Correct, it's you trying to win arguments with aggressive communication
No. You came into an argument without knowing the first thing about it
and you decided to side with the guy who wants to violate the project's
policy about review. Your behavior in this
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 6:05 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > Stop twisting people's words and implying things they never said :)
>
> This is not you presenting excuses.
>
Correct, it's you trying to win arguments with aggressive communication
> And thank you for
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> Stop twisting people's words and implying things they never said :)
This is not you presenting excuses.
> And thank you for ignoring my request to stay on topic
There is no topic to stay on: I will review this bug when time permits,
and you do not know anything
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:49 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > I'm not misrepresenting anybody's words,
>
> Me: “I never doubted that Paul's patches do make the bug go away in your
> test case.”
>
> You: “you insisted it wasn't there”
>
> This is precisely
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> I'm not misrepresenting anybody's words,
Me: “I never doubted that Paul's patches do make the bug go away in your
test case.”
You: “you insisted it wasn't there”
This is precisely misrepresenting my words.
So stop lying and present excuses.
--
Nicolas
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 4:46 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > Nice try but pointing out your logical fallacies is not being rude, but
> > rather is just showing you how easily your message can be misinterpreted,
>
> You have done nothing of the sort. You have just
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> Nice try but pointing out your logical fallacies is not being rude, but
> rather is just showing you how easily your message can be misinterpreted,
You have done nothing of the sort. You have just misrepresented my
words, showing that you decided to barge into a
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:50 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > world, please make a minimum of effort to keep communication polite
>
> Please realize that politeness resides not only in which words we use,
> like “bullshit”, but also in what we say, even if it is with
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> world, please make a minimum of effort to keep communication polite
Please realize that politeness resides not only in which words we use,
like “bullshit”, but also in what we say, even if it is with very mild
words. For example:
> while you insisted it wasn't
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:28 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > You gave no indication you were willing to, and I thought he gave you
> time
>
> Bullshit. Please do not intervene in a thread when you do not know what
> is going on at all. Paul has been repeatedly rude
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> You gave no indication you were willing to, and I thought he gave you time
Bullshit. Please do not intervene in a thread when you do not know what
is going on at all. Paul has been repeatedly rude and threatened to push
before review, yet it is towards me you
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:07 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> > Nicolas, have you thought of providing a patch to the bug Paul is
> > describing?
>
> Why do you not ask Paul if he have thought of giving me time to have a
> chance to do so?
>
You gave no indication you
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-06):
> Nicolas, have you thought of providing a patch to the bug Paul is
> describing?
Why do you not ask Paul if he have thought of giving me time to have a
chance to do so?
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:50 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-06):
> > Gonna apply soon.
>
> No you are not.
>
While I appreciate the brevity of this email, I think this kind of
communication is non constructive.
If the mailing list is the only and universal voice of the
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-06):
> Gonna apply soon.
No you are not.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe,
Gonna apply soon.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 8:07 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-04):
> > From 31a6a78ebc3a3f8785ec7c8e5ffd4257c7eadec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Paul B Mahol
> > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:26:50 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] avfilter/buffersrc: switch to activate
> >
> >
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-04):
> From 31a6a78ebc3a3f8785ec7c8e5ffd4257c7eadec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul B Mahol
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:26:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] avfilter/buffersrc: switch to activate
>
> Fixes error when caller keeps adding frames into filtergraph
> that
Attached.
From 31a6a78ebc3a3f8785ec7c8e5ffd4257c7eadec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul B Mahol
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:26:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] avfilter/buffersrc: switch to activate
Fixes error when caller keeps adding frames into filtergraph
that reached EOF by other means, for
46 matches
Mail list logo
