On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jan Ekström (2018-05-28):
>> Yet another case of forgotten 0 =! EOF translation.
>>
>> While the documentation for this specific synchronous read
>> function does not mention it, the documentation for
>> `sftp_async_read` documents it, as
Jan Ekström (2018-05-28):
> Yet another case of forgotten 0 =! EOF translation.
>
> While the documentation for this specific synchronous read
> function does not mention it, the documentation for
> `sftp_async_read` documents it, as well as looking at the
> implementation of this function leads
On Mon, May 28, 2018, 03:21 Jan Ekström wrote:
> Yet another case of forgotten 0 =! EOF translation.
>
> While the documentation for this specific synchronous read
> function does not mention it, the documentation for
> `sftp_async_read` documents it, as well as looking at the
Yet another case of forgotten 0 =! EOF translation.
While the documentation for this specific synchronous read
function does not mention it, the documentation for
`sftp_async_read` documents it, as well as looking at the
implementation of this function leads one to find
`if (handle->eof) { return