Le perjantaina 22. joulukuuta 2023, 3.41.29 EET flow gg a écrit :
> It's at c908
>
> According to the benchmark results, if vlseg2e64 is used, the speed is
> almost as slow as C language (dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 86.2), if vsseg2e64 is
> used, it will be only a bit slower (dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 50.2).
Fai
It's at c908
According to the benchmark results, if vlseg2e64 is used, the speed is
almost as slow as C language (dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 86.2), if vsseg2e64 is
used, it will be only a bit slower (dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 50.2).
Rémi Denis-Courmont 于2023年12月22日周五 04:52写道：
> Le tiistaina 19. joulukuuta 202
Le tiistaina 19. joulukuuta 2023, 4.53.12 EET flow gg a écrit :
> c908:
> dcmul_add_c: 88.0
> dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 46.2
>
> Did not use vlseg2e64, because it is much slower than vlse64
> Did not use vsseg2e64, because it is slightly slower than vsse64
Is this about C910 or C908? I have not checked
c908:
dcmul_add_c: 88.0
dcmul_add_rvv_f64: 46.2
Did not use vlseg2e64, because it is much slower than vlse64
Did not use vsseg2e64, because it is slightly slower than vsse64
From 80b6694bc29ed1c37852dc079a6d91a24dd6f18e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sunyuechi
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:11:28 +080
