On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 05:49:00AM -0700, Adam Richter wrote:
> This is the first of what I expect to be several patches to convert
> assertions of the
> form "assert(a && b)" to "assert(a); assert(b)".
>
> Here are some reasons why I think this would be an improvement. This
> lengthy argument
This is the first of what I expect to be several patches to convert
assertions of the
form "assert(a && b)" to "assert(a); assert(b)".
Here are some reasons why I think this would be an improvement. This
lengthy argument is not included in the patch attachment.
1. Assertion failures are often