On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:57:20AM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
Hi,
2015-02-17 20:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer jamr...@gmail.com:
$ make libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.o DBG=0
OK, it's mainly a matter of documentation then here, as just having
DBG defined is fine. I'm not sure of the makefile
Hi,
2015-02-17 20:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer jamr...@gmail.com:
$ make libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.o DBG=0
OK, it's mainly a matter of documentation then here, as just having
DBG defined is fine. I'm not sure of the makefile syntax if DBG=1 is
what is really wanted.
YASM
Hi,
2015-02-17 13:29 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at:
also, i wonder, should this be extended to also work with C files ?
Again, with asm, macro hell sometimes gives you that. So it makes sense.
I don't know well enough icc/llvm/whatever we handle, so the main
issue might be to
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
Hi,
2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at:
Doesn't this also need an update for make clean?
Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
allowing more genering (for now)
Hi,
2015-02-17 13:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at:
btw, this works too: (without DBG=1)
make V=2 libavcodec/x86/vp8dsp_loopfilter.dbg.o
Yeah, once I'm working on a specific file, that's what I do.
But iirc, you can just do make DBG=1 and wait for any error to mention
the
Hi,
2015-02-08 14:54 GMT+01:00 Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com:
2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at:
Doesn't this also need an update for make clean?
Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
allowing more genering (for
Suggestions for more efficient make rules, clearer documentation and a
better macro than the generic 'DBG' welcome.
--
Christophe
From 8e2adea82a4ec440744b701716a93e6ecaf211d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:18:27 +0100
Hi,
2015-02-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at:
Doesn't this also need an update for make clean?
Right, here's an updated one, also improving dependency generation and
allowing more genering (for now) code.
--
Christophe
From 6795382920c90fdf7e9cef5031627534c9df15b3 Mon Sep
Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisquet at gmail.com writes:
Suggestions for more efficient make rules, clearer documentation
and a better macro than the generic 'DBG' welcome.
Doesn't this also need an update for make clean?
Carl Eugen
___
