On 02/17/2016 02:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
the number of mails you send need time to write and if you had
something more important to do you wouldnt be so obsessed with that
one patch
I'm not more obsessed about this patch than anyone else here who wants
his/her patch applied. But you
On 02/17/2016 02:10 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/17/2016 02:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
and i know you understand the muxing side reasonable well as you
stated in your mails how its supposed to work, which matches what
i remember ...
No, Michael. I'm fairly new at FFmpeg development,
On 02/17/2016 02:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
and i know you understand the muxing side reasonable well as you
stated in your mails how its supposed to work, which matches what
i remember ...
No, Michael. I'm fairly new at FFmpeg development, and I have mostly
dealt with fixing demuxer
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer skrev: (17 februari 2016
> 12:36:58 CET)
> >On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >no, that
Mats Peterson skrev: (17 februari 2016
12:41:52 CET)
>Michael Niedermayer skrev: (17 februari 2016
>12:36:58 CET)
>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>
Mats Peterson skrev: (17 februari 2016
12:41:52 CET)
>Michael Niedermayer skrev: (17 februari 2016
>12:36:58 CET)
>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>
Michael Niedermayer skrev: (17 februari 2016 12:36:58
CET)
>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> >
>> >no, that patch is left for others to decide, my oppinion is that the
>> >muxer bug
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> >no, that patch is left for others to decide, my oppinion is that the
> >muxer bug must be fixed first to prevent the generation of invalid
> >files. I wanted to look into it
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:37:40 +0100
Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> And what about the monowhite switching code?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Did you forget that one??
> >
> > no, that patch is left for others to decide, my
On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
no, that patch is left for others to decide, my oppinion is that the
muxer bug must be fixed first to prevent the generation of invalid
files. I wanted to look into it as you dont look into it but i dont
have time now
That's OK regarding not
On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
And what about the monowhite switching code?
Did you forget that one??
no, that patch is left for others to decide, my oppinion is that the
muxer bug must be fixed first to prevent the generation of invalid
files. I wanted to look into it
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 03:04 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >Michael Niedermayer skrev: (16 februari 2016
> >15:03:13 CET)
> >>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>I have removed the 4-byte
On 02/16/2016 03:04 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Michael Niedermayer skrev: (16 februari 2016 15:03:13
CET)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
I have removed the 4-byte alignment line.
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
Michael Niedermayer skrev: (16 februari 2016 15:03:13
CET)
>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> I have removed the 4-byte alignment line.
>>
>> --
>> Mats Peterson
>> http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
>
>> rawdec.c |8 +++-
>> 1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> I have removed the 4-byte alignment line.
>
> --
> Mats Peterson
> http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
> rawdec.c |8 +++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 8368a0a3c0eab1db6651662f5108dac88e986c59
>
I have removed the 4-byte alignment line.
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
>From 6256d18629e70c24260e4cfb1993411ccebfac73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mats Peterson
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lavc/rawdec: Retrieve nut
Since we're creating a new frame due to the alignment requirement of 16
bytes, we'll have to retrieve the nut palette from the end of the packet
data.
Mats
>From 9627c56c50f5928e04345e5e62b123f2dbe4109c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mats Peterson
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016
On 02/14/2016 07:05 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
This one is incorrect.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
18 matches
Mail list logo