On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:57:27PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:55:25 +0100
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:26:52PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > > To make the best use of existing code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:55:25 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:26:52PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > To make the best use of existing code, I generalised the wrapper
> > that currently does yuv420p10 to p010 to support
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:26:52PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> To make the best use of existing code, I generalised the wrapper
> that currently does yuv420p10 to p010 to support any mixture of
> input and output sizes between 10 and 16 bits. This had the side
> effect of yielding a working cod
To make the best use of existing code, I generalised the wrapper
that currently does yuv420p10 to p010 to support any mixture of
input and output sizes between 10 and 16 bits. This had the side
effect of yielding a working code path for all yuv420p1x formats
to p01x.
Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale