> >> sizeof(AVFrame) is not part of the ABI. You need to allocate it
> >> somewhere.
> >>
> > Please tell more?
>
> See the documentation for AVFrame in libavutil/frame.h Use av_frame_alloc()
>
> Carl Eugen
Thanks Carl
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
2019-02-13 8:52 GMT+01:00, Wang, Shaofei :
>> > +AVFrame input_frm;
>>
>> sizeof(AVFrame) is not part of the ABI. You need to allocate it
>> somewhere.
>>
> Please tell more?
See the documentation for AVFrame in libavutil/frame.h
Use av_frame_alloc()
Carl Eugen
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:18 AM
It should be UTC time when received the email
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] Improved the
On 11/02/2019 22:41, Shaofei Wang wrote:
Please avoid sending messages from the future - the list received this about
thirteen hours before its supposed send time (received "Mon, 11 Feb 2019
11:42:09 +0200", sent "Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:41:04 -0500").
Probably the sending machine or some
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 05:41:04PM -0500, Shaofei Wang wrote:
> It enabled multiple filter graph concurrency, which bring above about
> 4%~20% improvement in some 1:N scenarios by CPU or GPU acceleration
>
> Below are some test cases and comparison as reference.
> (Hardware platform: Intel(R)
Code clean and remove the "-abr_pipeline" option, use the perf improved code
path by default only if HAVE_THREAD enabled.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
It enabled multiple filter graph concurrency, which bring above about
4%~20% improvement in some 1:N scenarios by CPU or GPU acceleration
Below are some test cases and comparison as reference.
(Hardware platform: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz)
(Software: Intel iHD driver - 16.9.00100,
