On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 01:22:03AM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Lou Logan wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:46:21 +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
> >
> >>Thank you for all your feedback, apparently there was some confusion
> >>because I
> >>have used "set" both as a synonym
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Lou Logan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:46:21 +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
Thank you for all your feedback, apparently there was some confusion because I
have used "set" both as a synonym to "enabled" and as an imperative. I have
changed all occurences of it to "enabled" o
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:46:21 +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
> Thank you for all your feedback, apparently there was some confusion because I
> have used "set" both as a synonym to "enabled" and as an imperative. I have
> changed all occurences of it to "enabled" or "use", so hopefully it will be
> mo
Thank you for all your feedback, apparently there was some confusion because I
have used "set" both as a synonym to "enabled" and as an imperative. I have
changed all occurences of it to "enabled" or "use", so hopefully it will be
more clear now. I have also done minor modifications in the text mos
