Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-11 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 01:42:31AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-06 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:11 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le torstaina 1. helmikuuta 2024, 19.45.52 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit : > > The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be > > either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the > sponsorship. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 1:42 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-03 Thread Stefano Sabatini
On date Saturday 2024-02-03 04:37:54 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > wants. > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should skip > the vote) > (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Jonatas On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:42:34PM -0300, Jonatas L. Nogueira via ffmpeg-devel wrote: [...] > Of course, if they voluntarily renounce the right to participate that's an > entirely different story. Anyone can do that, but that's entirely up to > them and trying to coerce them into

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le torstaina 1. helmikuuta 2024, 19.45.52 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit : > The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be > either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the sponsorship. Neither the community or the GA can forbid people from seeking funding

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Jonatas L. Nogueira via ffmpeg-devel
> The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the sponsorship. I honestly didn't understood this part. Maybe because I'm not involved with FFmpeg internal workings and policies, but could you clarify the exact

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:45:52PM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 9:45 AM, Vittorio Giovara > wrote: > > Since all objections and requests for more time have been ignored, and this > is happening anyway, can we add a small amendment for the sake of > transparency and for avoiding any conflict of interest? Whoever was > involved with the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > wants. > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should > skip the vote) > (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure the option in

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-01-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community wants. We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should skip the vote) (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure the option in the vote actually ask the GA the right question) The vote