Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-05 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 5:04 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi Kieran > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:51:23PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Are you able to document the differences between source.ffmpeg.org and > > git.ffmpeg.org? > > Why does one resolve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-05 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Kieran On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 06:03:55PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: [...] > > > > https://git.ffmpeg.org currently goes to a 403 Forbidden "You don't > > have permission to access this resource." > > Entering random URLs does sometimes produce errors > maybe you meant https://git.ffmpe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-05 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Kieran On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:51:23PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Are you able to document the differences between source.ffmpeg.org and > git.ffmpeg.org? > Why does one resolve to telepoint and one to VideoLAN? What is the > purpose of having two CNAMEs?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-04 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
Hi Michael, Are you able to document the differences between source.ffmpeg.org and git.ffmpeg.org? Why does one resolve to telepoint and one to VideoLAN? What is the purpose of having two CNAMEs? https://git.ffmpeg.org currently goes to a 403 Forbidden "You don't have permission to access this re

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:12:55AM -1000, compn wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:44:43 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi > > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:08:29PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:58:03PM +0100, martin schitter wrote: > > > > ffmpeg-

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-02 Thread Leo Izen
On 12/2/24 1:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi repository created: g...@git.ffmpeg.org:ffmpeg-internals TC + root + people providing the infrastructure should have access. (everyone listed needs to have access so they can update their entries or delete themselves) (root needs to have access

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-02 Thread compn
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:44:43 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:08:29PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:58:03PM +0100, martin schitter wrote: > > > ffmpeg-internals may sound nicer > > > > ok, sounds good to me. > > ill wait

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:08:29PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:58:03PM +0100, martin schitter wrote: > > > > > > On 30.11.24 21:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > What name should the repository have ? > > > ffmpeg-infra > > > ffmpeg-private > > > > > > (

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-30 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:58:03PM +0100, martin schitter wrote: > > > On 30.11.24 21:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > What name should the repository have ? > > ffmpeg-infra > > ffmpeg-private > > > > (i dont like the sound of "private" for a open source project) > > ffmpeg-internals may so

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-30 Thread martin schitter
On 30.11.24 21:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote: What name should the repository have ? ffmpeg-infra ffmpeg-private (i dont like the sound of "private" for a open source project) ffmpeg-internals may sound nicer ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-30 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 05:05:02PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Anton > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 04:17:00PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-19 23:16:17) > > > > > 3. who has what access (physical and remote/software). > > > > > 4. Who owns avcode

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Anton On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 04:17:00PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-19 23:16:17) > > > > 3. who has what access (physical and remote/software). > > > > 4. Who owns avcodec.org? Who runs these DNS servers? Who has access? > > > > Who has contacts? > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-28 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-19 23:16:17) > > > 3. who has what access (physical and remote/software). > > > 4. Who owns avcodec.org? Who runs these DNS servers? Who has access? > > > Who has contacts? > > For peoples names ideally we should start a non public list. Suggestions > anyone >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-19 Thread compn
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:16:45 +0200 Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le tiistaina 19. marraskuuta 2024, 5.18.52 EET compn a écrit : > > Since no one mentioned it this time around, i'll repeat what was > > said in the past. "ffmpeg" the name/trademark is not future proof. > > you cant just call yoursel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-19 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:40:30PM -1000, compn wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:16:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > > 6. document the release tarball checksum script in docs/website > > > > what is that ? > > James mentions your script being in the ml here > https://ffmpeg.org/p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-19 Thread compn
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:16:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > 6. document the release tarball checksum script in docs/website > > what is that ? James mentions your script being in the ml here https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-November/335971.html i dont know more details

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-19 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:18:52PM -1000, compn wrote: > On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:12:13 -1000 > compn wrote: > > > Here is a list of things people want documented. gathered from > > previous emails and memories: > > > > 1. Complete list of infrastructure I dont really know, if its not in inf

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-19 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le tiistaina 19. marraskuuta 2024, 5.18.52 EET compn a écrit : > Since no one mentioned it this time around, i'll repeat what was said > in the past. "ffmpeg" the name/trademark is not future proof. you cant > just call yourself FFapple, FFmicrosoft, FFsony, FFcocacola, ffDVD, > ffbluray, ffkodi, f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-18 Thread compn
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:12:13 -1000 compn wrote: > Here is a list of things people want documented. gathered from > previous emails and memories: > > 1. Complete list of infrastructure > 2. where servers are hosted (see infra.txt, our Telepoint.bg host) > 3. who has what access (physical and remo

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-11-16 Thread compn
Hello, to continue vdd meeting ideas here on mailing list where everyone can comment: Please comment on what you want documented. and if you think it should be a public document or just available to devs with git write access etc. could someone post the link to the videolan infrastructure docume