On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:59:29AM +0200, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 21.04.15 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 21.04.2015 08:14, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 20.04.15 um 23:20 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 19.04.2015 22:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd check that `master` is always between
Am 21.04.15 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 21.04.2015 08:14, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 20.04.15 um 23:20 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 19.04.2015 22:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd check that `master` is always between `raw_buffer` and the end of it.
You mean something like the attached
Am 20.04.15 um 23:20 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 19.04.2015 22:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 18/04/15 18:58, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
If begin is smaller than t, the subtraction 'begin -= t' wraps around,
because begin is unsigned. The same applies for end t.
This causes segmentation faults.
On 21.04.2015 08:14, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 20.04.15 um 23:20 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 19.04.2015 22:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd check that `master` is always between `raw_buffer` and the end of it.
You mean something like the attached patch?
(I'm not sure if `div_blocks` is
On 19.04.2015 22:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 18/04/15 18:58, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
If begin is smaller than t, the subtraction 'begin -= t' wraps around,
because begin is unsigned. The same applies for end t.
This causes segmentation faults.
Actually, the access to raw_buffer seems a
On 18.04.2015 21:55, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 18/04/15 18:58, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
If begin is smaller than t, the subtraction 'begin -= t' wraps around,
because begin is unsigned. The same applies for end t.
Why that variable is unsigned?
Probably because it should never be negative.
