Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 12:59:13 +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:02:16 +0200 > Ivo Andonov wrote: > > > 2017-02-03 23:18 GMT+02:00 Compn : > > > > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:46:20 +0200, Ivo Andonov > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:02:16 +0200 Ivo Andonov wrote: > 2017-02-03 23:18 GMT+02:00 Compn : > > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:46:20 +0200, Ivo Andonov > > wrote: > > > > > I successfully used a modified Pinetron library on Windows to use

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 18:08 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > 2017-02-03 18:16 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> How would another owner of this DVR get the streams? > > Now that is a separate question. If it has to be integrated in the ffmpeg > suite, I can provide a PHP

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 23:18 GMT+02:00 Compn : > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:46:20 +0200, Ivo Andonov > wrote: > > > I successfully used a modified Pinetron library on Windows to use my own > > software for decoding the stream. While fiddling with the modification I > > saw

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:46:20 +0200, Ivo Andonov wrote: > I successfully used a modified Pinetron library on Windows to use my own > software for decoding the stream. While fiddling with the modification I > saw they are using the statically linked FFmpeg API. the dvr

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 18:16 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > 2017-02-03 16:54 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > > 2017-02-03 16:59 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > > >> The encoder sets no user data, so identification is not as simple as > >> hoped: How do

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 16:54 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > 2017-02-03 16:59 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> The encoder sets no user data, so identification is not as simple as >> hoped: How do subsequent frames start? Do you know what the >> first bytes mean? >> > Yes,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 17:54 GMT+02:00 Ivo Andonov : > 2017-02-03 16:59 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > >> 2017-02-03 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : >> > 2017-02-03 15:58 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> >> >> > I've got some

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 16:59 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > 2017-02-03 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > > 2017-02-03 15:58 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > > >> > I've got some old Pinetron DVRs that are supposed to produce a MPEG4 > >> > bitstream.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > 2017-02-03 15:58 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : >> > I've got some old Pinetron DVRs that are supposed to produce a MPEG4 >> > bitstream. Indeed they are but no non-Pinetron software can decode it. >> >> Please

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 15:58 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos : > 2017-02-03 14:46 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > > This is my first post here. Actually my first post to a mailing list. > > Excuse me if this is the wrong place to write or if my mailing-list > culture > > is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

2017-02-03 14:46 GMT+01:00 Ivo Andonov : > This is my first post here. Actually my first post to a mailing list. > Excuse me if this is the wrong place to write or if my mailing-list culture > is not complete! Remember not to top-post here. > I've got some old Pinetron

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

On 2/3/17, Ivo Andonov wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This is my first post here. Actually my first post to a mailing list. > Excuse me if this is the wrong place to write or if my mailing-list culture > is not complete! > > I've got some old Pinetron DVRs that are supposed to

[FFmpeg-devel] DVR MPEG4 variant (AS-3024)

Hi Everyone, This is my first post here. Actually my first post to a mailing list. Excuse me if this is the wrong place to write or if my mailing-list culture is not complete! I've got some old Pinetron DVRs that are supposed to produce a MPEG4 bitstream. Indeed they are but no non-Pinetron