On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:45:46AM +, Kevin Wheatley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > if theres no way to store unknown range then your suggestion sounds
> > reasonable, can you send a patch?
>
> I'm not aware of a value to specify in the ACLR atom
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> if theres no way to store unknown range then your suggestion sounds
> reasonable, can you send a patch?
I'm not aware of a value to specify in the ACLR atom for unspecified -
I could guess at a value of 0 but that is pure speculation,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:17:34AM +, Kevin Wheatley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just looking through the FATE tests and the changes I wanted to make
> on reading ACLR atoms and I came across an issue. I wondered what the
> expected encoding range is for Y'CbCr during the FATE test runs as
> well as more
Hi,
Just looking through the FATE tests and the changes I wanted to make
on reading ACLR atoms and I came across an issue. I wondered what the
expected encoding range is for Y'CbCr during the FATE test runs as
well as more generally.
It would appear that the assumption that the range should be
AV
