On 6/29/16, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> I'm not sure where to post this message, but this list seemed the most
> appropriate.
>
> It seems like a better way to go about removing non-digital silence would be
> to convert each sample to float or double, then compare that to
I'm not sure where to post this message, but this list seemed the most
appropriate.
It seems like a better way to go about removing non-digital silence would be to
convert each sample to float or double, then compare that to the max dB
considered silence, then store the starting offset and