Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Fix loss of precision for silencedetect on large files

2019-03-29 Thread Allan Cady via ffmpeg-devel
Trying a desktop mail client instead of webmail. On 3/27/2019 11:19 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: this breaks make fate also if fate is updated it should be ensured it still checks enough precission and that it does produce the same results (fate passes) on all relevant platforms. This

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Fix loss of precision for silencedetect on large files

2019-03-29 Thread Allan Cady via ffmpeg-devel
Gck! Sorry guys about the formatting. Yahoo Mail sucks for anything slightly out of the norm... Let's try this again... if it doesn't work better, not sure what to do: On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 11:19:23 AM PDT, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > this breaks make fate> > also if fate is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Fix loss of precision for silencedetect on large files

2019-03-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:07:10PM +, Allan Cady via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > When the silencedetect filter is run against very large files, the > output timestamps gradually lose precision as the scan proceeds > further into the file. This is because the output is formatted (in >