On 1/29/16, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:50:01AM -0800, Timothy Gu wrote:
>> > It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more problematic
>> > license.
>
>> a reference to the comparision finding its infer
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:47:40PM -0800, Timothy Gu wrote:
>
> If I see no more comments, I will push this patch in one or two days.
Pushed with the libvo-aacenc removal patch.
I will add a website news entry soon.
Timothy
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing li
Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
> > > It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more
> > > problematic license.
> >
> > Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with
> > libvo.
> What do you mean by news entry? On the website?
Yes, a news entry on the website mentioning the removal
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:23:57AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
>
> > It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more problematic
> > license.
>
> Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with
> libvo.
Changelog entry added locally. What do you mean
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:50:01AM -0800, Timothy Gu wrote:
> It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more problematic
> license.
a reference to the comparision finding its inferriority should be
added to the commit mess
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:50:01AM -0800, Timothy Gu wrote:
> It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more problematic
> license.
a reference to the comparision finding its inferriority should be
added to the commit message
the exact license should also be mentioned maybe
[...]
--
Michael
Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
> It's inferior to fdk-aac and has an arguably more problematic
> license.
Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with
libvo.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org
