2018-07-12 0:03 GMT+02:00, Karsten Otto :
> Argh, just noticed a stupid mistake - quite obviously, the check pattern
> needs to be shifted too, i.e. 1<<19 instead of just 1. Luckily, it won't do
> any harm, since it can never evaluate to true.
>
> What is the protocol in this case - Do I send a
Argh, just noticed a stupid mistake - quite obviously, the check pattern
needs to be shifted too, i.e. 1<<19 instead of just 1. Luckily, it won't do
any harm, since it can never evaluate to true.
What is the protocol in this case - Do I send a new version of the patch?
Or another patch to the
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Karsten Otto wrote:
> Check the MPEG version ID for the reserved bit pattern 01, and abort the
> header check in that case. This reduces the chance of misinterpreting
> arbitrary data as a valid header, and prevents resulting audio artifacts.
> ---
>
