On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> The new patch looks good to me.
will apply
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in
ancient Greek republics:
The new patch looks good to me.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Xiaohan Wang (王消寒)
wrote:
> I uploaded a new patch. Is this what you meant?
>
> I am confused with the code though. In the case *ctts_index == ctts_count,
> this while loop will do nothing. Is this what we
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Xiaohan Wang (王消寒)
wrote:
> I uploaded a new patch. Is this what you meant?
>
> I am confused with the code though. In the case *ctts_index == ctts_count,
>
The problem is when *ctts_index == (ctts_count -1) .
if ( (ctts_count- 1) <
I uploaded a new patch. Is this what you meant?
I am confused with the code though. In the case *ctts_index == ctts_count,
this while loop will do nothing. Is this what we want? Also, the "wrong"
|ctts_index| will be available outside of this function. How do we make
sure it won't cause trouble
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
> index 5adba52e08..f0bd3e3623 100644
> --- a/libavformat/mov.c
> +++ b/libavformat/mov.c
> @@ -3148,7 +3148,7 @@ static int find_prev_closest_index(AVStream *st,
> *ctts_index = 0;
> *ctts_sample = 0;
> for
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:55:38PM -0800, Xiaohan Wang (王消寒) wrote:
>
> mov.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 87157b4053de0e044e78db72ef13e8058075c235
> 0001-Fix-ctts_index-calculation.patch
> From bb376fd2de5da5f9ecdef41621a579252b899d7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001