Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017 MPEG-4 ALS codec project

On 02/19/2017 09:30 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: [..] Although, be aware that the list of accepted organizations is yet to be published - we do not know yet if FFmpeg will be part of GSoC 2017. We can confirm this now. Participating orgs were announced today. Good luck with your quali

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017 MPEG-4 ALS codec project

Am 18.02.17 um 22:55 schrieb Thilo Borgmann: > Hi, > >> My name is George and I am a PhD student at Stanford. I am interested >> in the MPEG-4 ALS codec project for this year's GSoC program. >> >> Should I go straight into attempting to fix a bug of ALS on the >> tracker as a qualification task

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017 MPEG-4 ALS codec project

Hi, > My name is George and I am a PhD student at Stanford. I am interested > in the MPEG-4 ALS codec project for this year's GSoC program. > > Should I go straight into attempting to fix a bug of ALS on the > tracker as a qualification task and if so do you have a specific one > to recommend?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi all On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all just wanted to remind all that during February 10 - 26Google program administrators review organization applications the ideas page already looks quite good but any improvments you can do to it should

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi Pedro, On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Pedro Arthur wrote: > 2017-02-09 17:01 GMT-02:00 Ronald S. Bultje : > > > Before we get into adding new things to swscale: I will veto anything > that > > doesn't use the provided API in libavutil. So no new

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

2017-02-09 17:01 GMT-02:00 Ronald S. Bultje : > Before we get into adding new things to swscale: I will veto anything that > doesn't use the provided API in libavutil. So no new SWS_CS_*. > > Maybe is there something that doesn't use libavutil in swscale that can be turned in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:01:59 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:07:09PM

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi, On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:07:09PM -0200, Pedro Arthur wrote: > > > 2017-01-27 1:01 GMT-02:00 Michael Niedermayer :

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Michael Niedermayer wrote: >also in absence of any other ideas, YCoCg support may be a >qualification task. Maybe not the best choice but certainly >usefull on its own +1 Y'CoCg support would be useful indeed. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:07:09PM -0200, Pedro Arthur wrote: > > 2017-01-27 1:01 GMT-02:00 Michael Niedermayer : > > > > > we need more (backup) mentors, so yes, i think its needed > > > > > > also if you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

2017-01-27 1:01 GMT-02:00 Michael Niedermayer : > we need more (backup) mentors, so yes, i think its needed > > also if you want to be mentor for a swscale related project i would > support that idea Hi, sorry for the late reply. I think implementing a cascade-less swscale

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Am 30.01.17 um 18:41 schrieb Umair Khan: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann >> wrote: >>> Am 25.01.17 um 06:14 schrieb Umair Khan: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Am 30.01.17 um 18:41 schrieb Umair Khan: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann > wrote: >> Am 25.01.17 um 06:14 schrieb Umair Khan: >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer >>> wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Am 25.01.17 um 06:14 schrieb Umair Khan: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:34:24PM -0200, Pedro Arthur wrote: > Hi all, > I can be a backup mentor if needed. we need more (backup) mentors, so yes, i think its needed also if you want to be mentor for a swscale related project i would support that idea [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi, I am interested in joining one of the projects. Regards Mayank On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Pedro Arthur wrote: > Hi all, > I can be a backup mentor if needed. > > 2017-01-25 10:15 GMT-02:00 Thilo Borgmann : > > > Am 25.01.17 um 06:14

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi all, I can be a backup mentor if needed. 2017-01-25 10:15 GMT-02:00 Thilo Borgmann : > Am 25.01.17 um 06:14 schrieb Umair Khan: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Am 25.01.17 um 06:14 schrieb Umair Khan: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> GSoC 2017 mentor org registration has opened a few days ago >>> >>> Our current

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > GSoC 2017 mentor org registration has opened a few days ago > > > > Our current ideas page lists just a single mentor and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > GSoC 2017 mentor org registration has opened a few days ago > > Our current ideas page lists just a single mentor and single sugestion > http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/SponsoringPrograms/GSoC/2017 > > About the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:39:09 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > IIRC google suggests that ideas pages are writen and maintained > year round. I made a "master list" on the wiki several years ago. The intent was to have a single, maintained repository for ideas that we could pick and choose from

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2017

Hi, On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > IIRC google suggests that ideas pages are writen and maintained > year round. Now we have a list but some develoeprs seem to oppose some > of these old ideas, I would expect that for each objection against an >