[FFmpeg-devel] Pagure for ffmpeg (was Re: VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin))

2023-09-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 6:09 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi > > Iam a little tired so expect a more tidy mail in a few days but i want to > reply with a few points immedeately as they seem important. > > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > > > Gitlab (or

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 9/24/2023 11:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > What are you talking about? This is just people in the room, who asked to be > in the extra bucket, because they don't have the required commit numbers. It > does not mean it's the complete list. I do have the relevant commit numbers, I was

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libswresample/swresample: avoid s16p internal transfer format

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:32:28PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:02 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > From: Paul B Mahol > > > > Instead use float one by default for sample rate conversions. > > The s16p internal transfer format produces visible and hearable > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > libavdevice is using libavformat API that is unacceptable maintenance burden. This is a lie. You would not even know if libavdevice is a maintenance burden, you never touch it. -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/24/23, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> Citations needed. > > > >> libavdevice have no API. > > Yes, that was my point. If you do not understand why it is an essential > part of libavdevice, I suggest you take the time to learn what > libavdevice is all about and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > Citations needed. > libavdevice have no API. Yes, that was my point. If you do not understand why it is an essential part of libavdevice, I suggest you take the time to learn what libavdevice is all about and refrain from commenting on it before you have gotten a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/24/23, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> Define 'works'. >> >> It is clearly sub-optimal. > > Many users use it for many different tasks and it serves them > efficiently. > > There are probably ways to enhance the API of libavdevice. If you have > suggestions, then

[FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > Define 'works'. > > It is clearly sub-optimal. Many users use it for many different tasks and it serves them efficiently. There are probably ways to enhance the API of libavdevice. If you have suggestions, then please share them. But when you say that libavdevices

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans)

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/24/23, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> libavdevice is abusing libavformat. >> >> It should have own API or be removed. > > libavdevice works. Define 'works'. It is clearly sub-optimal. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] dxa patch

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
Attached. From 8863580694665ff33312829209b7aabc41ae1855 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul B Mahol Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 19:28:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] avcodec/dxa: use uint8_t for type of arrays Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol --- libavcodec/dxa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Michael Niedermayer (12023-09-24): > Also SW must be easy maintainable, everything i hear of gitlab is saying > the opposit. I have not read the rest of the message yet, for now I just want to mention that a non-negligible part of my job in the last year involved upgrading GitLab after emergency

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 04:10:00PM +0100, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 1:40 PM Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > > DNS > > > --- > > > > > > - Currently the DNS of ffmpeg.org is managed by Fabrice > > > - Michael was asked

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] fate/ffprobe: FATE antiyellow --disable-avfilter

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- tests/fate/ffprobe.mak | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/fate/ffprobe.mak b/tests/fate/ffprobe.mak index d2abe8a11e1..ee76a0dab3f 100644 --- a/tests/fate/ffprobe.mak +++ b/tests/fate/ffprobe.mak @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] fate/api: FATE antiyellow --disable-avfilter

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- tests/fate/api.mak | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/fate/api.mak b/tests/fate/api.mak index 688fc0f9b39..ebdedd3ff5b 100644 --- a/tests/fate/api.mak +++ b/tests/fate/api.mak @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] tests/fate/libswscale: Fixing yellow fate

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- tests/fate/libswscale.mak | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/fate/libswscale.mak b/tests/fate/libswscale.mak index f8572f9c37b..f2dcd352560 100644 --- a/tests/fate/libswscale.mak +++ b/tests/fate/libswscale.mak @@

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Michael, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > Gitlab (or something like Gitlab) > > - > > > > - Ronald is proposing that we move to Gitlab, or something similar > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 1:40 PM Marton Balint wrote: > On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > DNS > > --- > > > > - Currently the DNS of ffmpeg.org is managed by Fabrice > > - Michael was asked if he has control over the ffmpeg.org DNS > register. > > - Michael says he thinks he

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 02:36:20PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > > DNS > > --- > > > > - Currently the DNS of ffmpeg.org is managed by Fabrice > > - Michael was asked if he has control over the ffmpeg.org DNS register. > > - Michael says

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Marton Balint
On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Kyle Swanson wrote: DNS --- - Currently the DNS of ffmpeg.org is managed by Fabrice - Michael was asked if he has control over the ffmpeg.org DNS register. - Michael says he thinks he has some. - Ronald would be curious to know what "some" means. - Ronald

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans)

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > libavdevice is abusing libavformat. > > It should have own API or be removed. libavdevice works. -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans)

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:12 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Neal Gompa (12023-09-23): > > If it's just taking SDR devices as inputs and allowing you to encode > > audio and video streams, I'm not sure why you *wouldn't* have this as > > something in libavdevice or extended from it as a separate

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] VDD 2023, FFmpeg meeting notes, (23-11-2023, 4pm, Dublin)

2023-09-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Kempf
>> General Assembly, Candidates (J-B will mail a vote): >> - BBB >> - Derek > > Quite interresting that every single developer who probably isnt going > to support > some of the significant changes proposed later disappeared from the > Previous > Candidates What are you talking about? This

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Propagate PRFT side data

2023-09-24 Thread Clément Péron
Hi, I plan to resent this series without the latest patch. Regarding Patch 1 and 2 do you have any comment? One thing is that unlike the decode.c which has a common ff_decode_frame_props_from_pkt() there is no such thing for the encode part. Or maybe I missed it ? I noticed that the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans)

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Neal Gompa (12023-09-23): > If it's just taking SDR devices as inputs and allowing you to encode > audio and video streams, I'm not sure why you *wouldn't* have this as > something in libavdevice or extended from it as a separate library. The people who oppose Michael's SDR also have been trying