Note: I have no idea what YUVJ is (I assume you want to remove it, not to
implement it?) and I forgot to mention "reverted work" (likely in the form
"work not yet merged or reverted within 30 days after being merged"). The
goal here was to make easier to understand what's expected.
Of course, I
That's not a problem at all; because you can divide the work into discrete
pieces after it's done (on the invoice), just like liberal professionals
(eg. accountants, lawyers, administrators, etc.)
The SOW defines what is acceptable on the invoice (so in the YUVJ case, for
example, it could be
While it's true a traditional SOW breaks work into milestones, we're going
for a simplified one here out of need. Think on when you ask for
consulting, not when you ask for a feature. You should not assume we want
to write eg. "Finish removing YUVJ by date X" ─ that's not the plan and as
you said
Keep in mind I only receive messages if I'm explicitly in the To field. I'm
with only half of the context, so my
messages may sound weird, out of context, repetitive, etc. In any case.
>> [...] the GA definitly cannot object to an invoice for a project that
the GA approved previously.
> "The
There are no agreements between SPI and STF as of 31st January 2024.
However, if you submit a Scope of Work, then an agreement will be made if
STF approves the sponsorship (on the Feb 14th or later).
I assume you don't mean National Association of Broadcasters by "NAB", so I
would need to know
I can't find anything in SPI related to NAB either. I can ask the officers
if they're aware of something from NAB, but I don't think that would be the
case.
I can find some old booths for FOSSEM, FOSDEM and whatnot though. Can you
double check?
(Also: What's the relation between NAB and this
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:11 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le keskiviikkona 31. tammikuuta 2024, 16.10.02 EET Jonatas L. Nogueira via
> ffmpeg-devel a écrit :
> > > IMO hasty actions and avoidable drama may cause damage to the project
> >
> &
Again, this sounds like a misunderstanding.
The SOW is subservient to the merge, not the other way around. In other
words, the SOW don't require you to merge, but when/if you do merge, then
the SOW will require the payment to the contractor, which SPI handles. So
the SOW makes clear that if
Please keep in mind we're a public charity using public money from
taxpayers, which means we need a criteria for payments and that said
payments must be issued objectively. The GA might be able to distribute
money with subjective criterias... But not this specific money which is
being discussed. I
> The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be
either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the sponsorship.
I honestly didn't understood this part. Maybe because I'm not involved with
FFmpeg internal workings and policies, but could you clarify the exact
Anton: "whether anything requires the projects to be owned by
individuals"... I don't think so. At least, not from the SPI side, STF
might have objections which I cannot anticipate.
But from the SPI side, we probably could do a MSA/SOW with a company rather
than individuals just fine, although I
> IMO hasty actions and avoidable drama may cause damage to the project
What would be a hasty action? I've seen far too much people calling action
over stuff discussed for weeks/months as "hasty" in attempt to stall into
endless discussions, so you might want to clarify.
> The question is, what
e done in time.
--
Jonatas L. Nogueira (“jesusalva”)
Board of Directors Member
Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:17 PM Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 14:10, Jonatas L. Nogueira via ffmpeg-devel <
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote
you start discussing how to properly pay for the hours spent hunting
> simple typo mistakes now, you'll never be able to tell STF what actually
> needs to be done in time.
>
> --
> Jonatas L. Nogueira (“jesusalva”)
> Board of Directors Member
> Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
This is the courtesy reminder we've agreed on, to remember there's a week
left to finish the Scope of Work if FFmpeg wishes to deliver it by February
12th as requested by STF.
Att.,
Jonatas L. Nogueira (“Jesusalva”)
SPI Board of Directors
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, 21:16 Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
