Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] mov: check color parameter type explicitly. Fixes ticket #4387.

2015-03-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:26:30AM +0100, Jochen Strunk wrote:
 Hi,
 
 this fixes ticket #4387. It accepts non-standard isom files like the
 panasonic sample attached to the ticket (with ’nclc’ color type instead of
 ’nclx’) which seems to me in this case is a better option than failing or
 falling back to defaults.

  mov.c |2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 5a569e4c0621a829efa94734acd32efe61c08d2f  
 0001-mov-check-color-parameter-type-explicitly.-Fixes-tic.patch
 From 572146712c3182f2ef6b61127fcc1606905be673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Jochen Strunk str...@lesspain.de
 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:39:27 +0100
 Subject: [PATCH] mov: check color parameter type explicitly. Fixes ticket
  #4387.

you are the 2nd who submits this fix

applied, thanks

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
dead. -- Aristotle 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] mov: check color parameter type explicitly. Fixes ticket #4387.

2015-03-24 Thread Jochen Strunk
Hi,

this fixes ticket #4387. It accepts non-standard isom files like the
panasonic sample attached to the ticket (with ’nclc’ color type instead of
’nclx’) which seems to me in this case is a better option than failing or
falling back to defaults.


0001-mov-check-color-parameter-type-explicitly.-Fixes-tic.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel