Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add nvidia hw decode support for HEVC 4:4:4 content
2018-10-20 23:43 GMT+02:00, Timo Rothenpieler : > On 20.10.2018 23:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-10-20 23:16 GMT+02:00, Timo Rothenpieler : >>> On 20.10.2018 23:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-10-20 22:46 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale : > The big discussion was about the new pixel formats. I would > like to get to a clear conclusion on this otherwise, this patch > series goes nowhere forever Wouldn't it be an alternative to first commit the patch with P16 and then discuss what the disadvantage is? >>> >>> How would you tell apart 10 and 12 bit content? >> >> You write it into raw_bits_per_pixel. > > You mean bits_per_raw_sample? Yes. > To do that in a way that's actually usable In which way is it not usable now? Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add nvidia hw decode support for HEVC 4:4:4 content
On 20.10.2018 23:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-10-20 23:16 GMT+02:00, Timo Rothenpieler : On 20.10.2018 23:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-10-20 22:46 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale : The big discussion was about the new pixel formats. I would like to get to a clear conclusion on this otherwise, this patch series goes nowhere forever Wouldn't it be an alternative to first commit the patch with P16 and then discuss what the disadvantage is? How would you tell apart 10 and 12 bit content? You write it into raw_bits_per_pixel. You mean bits_per_raw_sample? To do that in a way that's actually usable we start going back the whole rabbit hole though. It starts with the field missing on frames, and goes on with nothing using it for video at all so far, only for audio, where that kinda setup is actually well supported. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add nvidia hw decode support for HEVC 4:4:4 content
2018-10-20 23:16 GMT+02:00, Timo Rothenpieler : > On 20.10.2018 23:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-10-20 22:46 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale : >> >>> The big discussion was about the new pixel formats. I would >>> like to get to a clear conclusion on this otherwise, this patch >>> series goes nowhere forever >> >> Wouldn't it be an alternative to first commit the patch with P16 >> and then discuss what the disadvantage is? > > How would you tell apart 10 and 12 bit content? You write it into raw_bits_per_pixel. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add nvidia hw decode support for HEVC 4:4:4 content
On 20.10.2018 23:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-10-20 22:46 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale : The big discussion was about the new pixel formats. I would like to get to a clear conclusion on this otherwise, this patch series goes nowhere forever Wouldn't it be an alternative to first commit the patch with P16 and then discuss what the disadvantage is? How would you tell apart 10 and 12 bit content? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
