On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:06:09PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:03:47AM -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Vittorio Giovara
> > > wrote
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer <
mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:03:47AM -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Vittorio Giovara
> > wrote:
> > >> this does not follow from what you write below. But more so this is
>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:03:47AM -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Vittorio Giovara
> wrote:
> >> this does not follow from what you write below. But more so this is not
> >> how pixel formats were implemented in FFmpeg.
> >> Where does this idea come from ?
> >
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
>> this does not follow from what you write below. But more so this is not
>> how pixel formats were implemented in FFmpeg.
>> Where does this idea come from ?
>
> I found the following description of this pixel format pretty accurate:
> ht
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:58:06PM +0200,Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Its a consequence of the subsampling factor.
>
> this does not follow from what you write below. But more so this is not
> how pixel formats were implemented in FFmpeg.
> Where does this idea come from ?
I found the following