On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:04:06PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 1/27/2016 10:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > is the avctx->ticks_per_frame != 0 check needed?
>
> I have no idea, actually.
i think its not needed
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC78
On 1/27/2016 10:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> is the avctx->ticks_per_frame != 0 check needed?
I have no idea, actually.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On 1/27/2016 9:13 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
> ---
> libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[21:58] <@nevcairiel> Daemon404: you should push that diff-by-zero patch,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:13:19PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
> ---
> libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c b/libavcodec/utils
It could accidentally divide by zero if num was zero.
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis
---
libavcodec/utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c b/libavcodec/utils.c
index 13ee243..491d8ea 100644
--- a/libavcodec/utils.c
+++ b/libavcodec/utils.c