On 5/3/2018 8:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Kevin Wheatley
> wrote:
>
>> Following up my own email with another question or so:
>>
>> Could somebody point me at a suitable method of testing this within
>> the Fate framework?
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Why?
>
> Your patch fixes a bug, I don't think we test bugs in fate, just features.
I am perhaps making an incorrect assumption that the code has a bug
because it is never tested and that by adding a test that simply
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Kevin Wheatley
wrote:
> Following up my own email with another question or so:
>
> Could somebody point me at a suitable method of testing this within
> the Fate framework?
Why?
Your patch fixes a bug, I don't think we test bugs
Following up my own email with another question or so:
Could somebody point me at a suitable method of testing this within
the Fate framework?
I've started to try unpick how the fate tests are run, etc
What I need is a prototypical example which presumably would need to
factor in (what I
Following on from my report in the user list here is a better than a
quick hack suggestion to avoid trying to join on an invalid thread id.
This may not be the best solution, but it does avoid the SEGV on linux
when calling pthread_join()
Kevin
From a94d0cb7ff4202487ea980a029fa613c58d6d7c3 Mon