On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:26:58AM +0300, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > This is as far as 22.2 follows the same channel order as
> > WaveFormatExtensible's channel mask (and the AV_CH_* defines).
> >
> > After LFE2 the side channels would
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:26:58AM +0300, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > This is as far as 22.2 follows the same channel order as
> > WaveFormatExtensible's channel mask (and the AV_CH_* defines).
> >
> > After LFE2 the side channels would
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:29 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:26:58AM +0300, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > > This is as far as 22.2 follows the same channel order as
> > > WaveFormatExtensible's channel mask (and
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:26:58AM +0300, Jan Ekström wrote:
> This is as far as 22.2 follows the same channel order as
> WaveFormatExtensible's channel mask (and the AV_CH_* defines).
>
> After LFE2 the side channels would follow, but that offset of
> one stops us from utilizing them without
This is as far as 22.2 follows the same channel order as
WaveFormatExtensible's channel mask (and the AV_CH_* defines).
After LFE2 the side channels would follow, but that offset of
one stops us from utilizing them without further tweaks.
This change was verified by using swresample to downmix
