On 14.10.2016 18:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:56:56AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> If you want both NX and ASLR security features for an executable it has
>> to be built with '-pie' and must not contain text relocations.
>
> this should not be true
> the differ
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:28:32PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:56:56AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > On 12.10.2016 23:44, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > 2016-10-12 19:04 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
> > > :
> > >> On 04.10.2016 12:24, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:56:56AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 12.10.2016 23:44, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > 2016-10-12 19:04 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
> > :
> >> On 04.10.2016 12:24, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
> >>>
On 14.10.2016 15:02, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-10-04 12:24 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>
>> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
>> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
>
> Tested successfully on x86_64 and x86_32 Linux (pie actu
2016-10-04 12:24 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
Tested successfully on x86_64 and x86_32 Linux (pie actually works
on my very old system). On Debian hppa, the
On 12.10.2016 23:44, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-10-12 19:04 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
> :
>> On 04.10.2016 12:24, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
>>> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
>>
>> This
2016-10-12 19:04 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun :
> On 04.10.2016 12:24, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
>> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
>
> This script uses a very simplistic approach for testing pos
On 04.10.2016 12:24, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
This script uses a very simplistic approach for testing position
independent executables.
I think it just does t
2016-10-05 15:14 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> Patch sent that fixes this issue.
I'll apply both patches if there are no objections.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
2016-10-04 18:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:24:00PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
>> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
> only case i found that breaks is w
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:24:00PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
> script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
>
> Please comment, Carl Eugen
only case i found that breaks is with --enable-lib
Hi!
Sorry if I miss something but with this patch, the hardening_check
script succeeds here both for x86_32 and x86_64 (static and shared).
Please comment, Carl Eugen
From 3c5df95a022e9148f753dd2a850570080740c602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:21:41 +02
12 matches
Mail list logo
