On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 5:25 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-07-22):
> > What about an audio?
>
> Are we in the business of refusing a patch adding an interesting feature
> because we want two interesting features instead?
>
Double standards, not unexpected from you.
>
> > This
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:28:31 +0200, you wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:40?PM John Cox wrote:
>
>> Add a callback to enable user allocation of video frames on the final
>> stage of a filter chain.
>>
>>
>What about an audio?
I have a use case for video and none for audio, but I can add audio
Hi
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:12:51 +0200, you wrote:
>John Cox (12023-07-20):
>> Add a callback to enable user allocation of video frames on the final
>> stage of a filter chain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Cox
>> ---
>> libavfilter/buffersink.c | 21 +
>>
Paul B Mahol (12023-07-22):
> What about an audio?
Are we in the business of refusing a patch adding an interesting feature
because we want two interesting features instead?
> This works only for sinks mostly, what about filters inside graph?
It is already in place, it has been for years. This
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:40 PM John Cox wrote:
> Add a callback to enable user allocation of video frames on the final
> stage of a filter chain.
>
>
What about an audio?
This works only for sinks mostly, what about filters inside graph?
> Signed-off-by: John Cox
> ---
>
John Cox (12023-07-20):
> Add a callback to enable user allocation of video frames on the final
> stage of a filter chain.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Cox
> ---
> libavfilter/buffersink.c | 21 +
> libavfilter/buffersink.h | 27 +++
>
Add a callback to enable user allocation of video frames on the final
stage of a filter chain.
Signed-off-by: John Cox
---
libavfilter/buffersink.c | 21 +
libavfilter/buffersink.h | 27 +++
libavfilter/version.h| 2 +-
3 files changed, 49
