On 12/4/18, 2:18 PM, "Gyan Doshi" wrote:
>On 04-12-2018 02:11 PM, Karthick J wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> +@item -movflags no_sidx
>> +Don't write sidx atom.
>
>Append a short note advising when this is required or recommended and
>when not.
Thanks for your comment. I have added more details in PATCH v2
On 12/4/18, 4:25 PM, "Tobias Rapp" wrote:
>>On 04.12.2018 09:41, Karthick J wrote:
>>[...]
>> Run a second pass moving the index (moov atom) to the beginning of the
>> file.
>> This operation can take a while, and will not work in various situations
>> such
>
>What about naming the option
On 04.12.2018 09:41, Karthick J wrote:
---
doc/muxers.texi | 2 ++
libavformat/movenc.c | 7 +--
libavformat/movenc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi b/doc/muxers.texi
index f1cc6f5fee..6ca27b04a3 100644
--- a/doc/muxers.texi
+++
On 04-12-2018 02:11 PM, Karthick J wrote:
diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi b/doc/muxers.texi
index f1cc6f5fee..6ca27b04a3 100644
--- a/doc/muxers.texi
+++ b/doc/muxers.texi
@@ -1325,6 +1325,8 @@ more efficient), but with this option set, the muxer
writes one moof/mdat
pair for each track, making
---
doc/muxers.texi | 2 ++
libavformat/movenc.c | 7 +--
libavformat/movenc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi b/doc/muxers.texi
index f1cc6f5fee..6ca27b04a3 100644
--- a/doc/muxers.texi
+++ b/doc/muxers.texi
@@ -1325,6 +1325,8 @@ more
