On 09/02/2014 06:03 PM, wm4 wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:33:26 +0200
Jörg Krause jkra...@posteo.de wrote:
Add the feature test macro which is required for building with the
musl toolchain.
The feature test macro _XOPEN_SOURCE = 600 provides the XSI-compliant
version of strerror_r().
Add the feature test macro which is required for building with the
musl toolchain.
The feature test macro _XOPEN_SOURCE = 600 provides the XSI-compliant
version of strerror_r().
Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause jkra...@posteo.de
---
libavutil/error.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:33:26PM +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
Add the feature test macro which is required for building with the
musl toolchain.
The feature test macro _XOPEN_SOURCE = 600 provides the XSI-compliant
version of strerror_r().
is there a reason why you dont set it from
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
Am 02.09.2014 12:40 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:33:26PM +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
Add the feature test macro which is required for building with the
musl toolchain.
The feature test macro
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:33:26 +0200
Jörg Krause jkra...@posteo.de wrote:
Add the feature test macro which is required for building with the
musl toolchain.
The feature test macro _XOPEN_SOURCE = 600 provides the XSI-compliant
version of strerror_r().
Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 07:41:40PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
Am 02.09.2014 12:40 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:33:26PM
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:31:39PM +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
The maintainers of the musl C library states that looking for __GLIBC__ or
__UCLIBC__ and making assumptions about the implemented feature set is not
the best way. Instead features.h should be inspected for the specification
of the
