Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavf/timecode: document SMPTE struct

2018-10-11 Thread Joshua de Kock
On 9 October 2018 at 21:21, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > >> On Oct 9, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> >> 2018-10-09 15:32 GMT+02:00, jos...@ob-encoder.com : >>> From: Devin Heitmueller >>> >>> There are a number of different binary representations in which >>> SMPTE timecodes can

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavf/timecode: document SMPTE struct

2018-10-09 Thread Devin Heitmueller
> On Oct 9, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2018-10-09 15:32 GMT+02:00, jos...@ob-encoder.com : >> From: Devin Heitmueller >> >> There are a number of different binary representations in which >> SMPTE timecodes can use. Make clear that the specific representation >> that

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavf/timecode: document SMPTE struct

2018-10-09 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-10-09 15:32 GMT+02:00, jos...@ob-encoder.com : > From: Devin Heitmueller > > There are a number of different binary representations in which > SMPTE timecodes can use. Make clear that the specific representation > that ffmpeg refers to corresponds to the DV video spec, which is > SMPTE

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavf/timecode: document SMPTE struct

2018-10-09 Thread joshdk
From: Devin Heitmueller There are a number of different binary representations in which SMPTE timecodes can use. Make clear that the specific representation that ffmpeg refers to corresponds to the DV video spec, which is SMPTE S314M:2005 for standard definition video and ST 370-2013 for high