On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 12:14:37AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > SIMD code will not have to deal with padding itself. Overwriting in that
> > function may have been possible but involve large overreading of the
> > sources.
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> SIMD code will not have to deal with padding itself. Overwriting in that
> function may have been possible but involve large overreading of the
> sources. Instead, we simply make sure the width to process is always a
> multiple of
SIMD code will not have to deal with padding itself. Overwriting in that
function may have been possible but involve large overreading of the
sources. Instead, we simply make sure the width to process is always a
multiple of 16. Additionally, there must be some actual area to process
so the SIMD
