Thanks for looking at it.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2016-08-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Burt P. :
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> It seems safer to me to use the actual
Hi!
2016-08-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Burt P. :
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> It seems safer to me to use the actual number of channels than the
>> channel layout.
>
> Alright, new patch version incoming.
No more comments from me.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> It seems safer to me to use the actual number of channels than the
> channel layout.
Alright, new patch version incoming.
--
Burt
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Hi!
2016-08-23 1:01 GMT+02:00 Burt P :
> +int channel_count =
> av_get_channel_layout_nb_channels(inlink->channel_layout);
It seems safer to me to use the actual number of channels than the
channel layout.
(Or to say it differently: It is most likely a bug that FFmpeg
Mostly just re-arranges some code to make it easier to update this
filter and libhdcd together. filter_frame() is much simpler as a
result.
* use the HDCD detection data structure and functions from libhdcd
* moved detection code out of filter_frame()
* moved analyze_mode preparation out of