---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Michael
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:41:57AM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
The only remaining floats are in the user interface, they are left as they
should not cause a problem in practice
---
libavfilter/vf_lenscorrection.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_lenscorrection.c
So we prefer int64_t above float32? I assumed we stick with 32bits for
calculations. Did you test this with very large resolutions? I so
congratulation :). I am glad I could push you to finish what I failed to do :).
As I would still like to have interpolation, I assume I shall refactor the
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:23:10PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
So we prefer int64_t above float32?
well, its not exactly making me happy either but its just 2
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
The only remaining floats are in the user interface, they are left as they
should not cause a problem in practice
---
libavfilter/vf_lenscorrection.c | 13
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:42:35PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
The only remaining floats are in the user interface, they are left as they
should not cause a
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:36:29PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:23:10PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
So we prefer int64_t above
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:42:35PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Michael
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:58:50PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:36:29PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:58:50PM +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
---
Daniel Oberhoff
daniel.oberh...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Michael
11 matches
Mail list logo