On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 16:48:39 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> I think better thing to do is to add streamhash muxer instead of doing
> it in hash muxer.
If that's the general wish, I will reimplement it as such.
The code reuse will be similar, so I assume the other approaches are
okay?
I think better thing to do is to add streamhash muxer instead of doing
it in hash muxer.
On 8/11/19, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> Non-frame based muxers only, the frame based ones are already per
> stream.
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Barsnick
> ---
> doc/muxers.texi | 5 +
>
Non-frame based muxers only, the frame based ones are already per
stream.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Barsnick
---
doc/muxers.texi | 5 +
libavformat/hashenc.c | 41 +
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/muxers.texi
