Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2018-01-03 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 2 January 2018 at 16:47, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > On 30 December 2017 at 14:59, Rostislav Pehlivanov > wrote: > >> Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility >> with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2018-01-02 Thread James Almer
On 1/2/2018 2:48 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 2 January 2018 at 17:01, wm4 wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:47:14 + >> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >> >>> On 30 December 2017 at 14:59, Rostislav Pehlivanov >>> wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2018-01-02 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 2 January 2018 at 17:01, wm4 wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:47:14 + > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > On 30 December 2017 at 14:59, Rostislav Pehlivanov > > wrote: > > > > > Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2018-01-02 Thread wm4
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:47:14 + Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 30 December 2017 at 14:59, Rostislav Pehlivanov > wrote: > > > Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility > > with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2018-01-02 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 30 December 2017 at 14:59, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility > with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated > functionality provided by libswresample. > > In order to improve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread wm4
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 17:21:46 + Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 12/30/2017 5:11 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > I'm in favour of deprecating and eventually removing it. As Mike used to > > say: you need to break eggs to make omelettes. > > I'm in favour simply

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 12/30/2017 5:11 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > I'm in favour of deprecating and eventually removing it. As Mike used to > say: you need to break eggs to make omelettes. I'm in favour simply because I don't know of a good reason to *not* deprecate it? Does it have ASM, modes, APIs, etc. that

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 30 December 2017 at 15:15, wm4 wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:59:19 + > > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > > > Deprecate the entire library. Merged

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 30 December 2017 at 15:15, wm4 wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:59:19 + > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility > > with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread wm4
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:59:19 + Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility > with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated > functionality provided by libswresample. > > In order to

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] lavr: deprecate the entire library

2017-12-30 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated functionality provided by libswresample. In order to improve consistency and reduce attack surface, as well as to ease burden on maintainers, it has