On 4/24/18, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote:
>> > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23):
>> >> It is big threat.
>> >
>> > Will you please give arguments instead of
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23):
> >> It is big threat.
> >
> > Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things
> > endlessly?
> >
> > I think I intuitively agree
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
> That's fine, I even understand and relate to that. However, as a user, I
> utterly don't care about it, as a I user I want to use the best tool
> available today, let it be free or not, open source or not. If you are
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
>> Hi Thilo,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi Thilo,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have wrappers for a
commercial codec.
Right, that's the core thing.
Why doesn't FFmpeg "promote"
Hi Thilo,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
> From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have wrappers for a
> commercial codec.
Right, that's the core thing.
Why doesn't FFmpeg "promote" the use of this closed-source software?
Maybe
On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23):
>> It is big threat.
>
> Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things
> endlessly?
>
> I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you
> objection is worthless, and Thilo would
Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23):
> It is big threat.
Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things
endlessly?
I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you
objection is worthless, and Thilo would be entitled to just ignore it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 23.04.18 um 22:47 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>> On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
not expressing specific agreement or disagreement.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann
Am 23.04.18 um 22:47 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol
Hi,
> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement.
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>
>> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
>>> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann
On 23 April 2018 at 20:32, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> > Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
> >> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >>> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
>> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Hi,
V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived
Hi Thilo,
not expressing specific agreement or disagreement.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
> > On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer:
> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived
>>> 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side...
>>> Also dropped audio
On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived
>> 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side...
>> Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it.
>>
>>
On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived
> 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side...
> Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it.
>
> Adapted to current HEAD.
I'm strongly against
Hi,
V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived
02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side...
Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it.
Adapted to current HEAD.
Thanks,
Thilo
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
19 matches
Mail list logo