Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/24/18, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote: >> > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): >> >> It is big threat. >> > >> > Will you please give arguments instead of

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote: > > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): > >> It is big threat. > > > > Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things > > endlessly? > > > > I think I intuitively agree

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Jan Ekström
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Marton Balint wrote: > > That's fine, I even understand and relate to that. However, as a user, I > utterly don't care about it, as a I user I want to use the best tool > available today, let it be free or not, open source or not. If you are >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >> Hi Thilo, >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann >> wrote: >> >>> From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Marton Balint
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi Thilo, On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have wrappers for a commercial codec. Right, that's the core thing. Why doesn't FFmpeg "promote"

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Thilo, On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > From the users perspective I don't see why we don't have wrappers for a > commercial codec. Right, that's the core thing. Why doesn't FFmpeg "promote" the use of this closed-source software? Maybe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/23/18, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): >> It is big threat. > > Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things > endlessly? > > I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you > objection is worthless, and Thilo would

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): > It is big threat. Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things endlessly? I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you objection is worthless, and Thilo would be entitled to just ignore it. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Am 23.04.18 um 22:47 schrieb Paul B Mahol: >> On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement. On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Am 23.04.18 um 22:47 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann >>> wrote: >>> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Hi, > >> not expressing specific agreement or disagreement. >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann >> wrote: >> >>> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Hi, > not expressing specific agreement or disagreement. > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann > wrote: > >> Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: >>> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 23 April 2018 at 20:32, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > > Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: > >> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/23/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: >> On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: Hi, V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Thilo, not expressing specific agreement or disagreement. On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: > > On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-23 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Am 23.04.18 um 03:36 schrieb James Almer: > On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived >>> 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side... >>> Also dropped audio

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-22 Thread James Almer
On 4/22/2018 6:43 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived >> 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side... >> Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it. >> >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-22 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/22/18, Thilo Borgmann wrote: > Hi, > > V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived > 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side... > Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it. > > Adapted to current HEAD. I'm strongly against

[FFmpeg-devel] [V3 PATCH 0/3] Codec wrapper for librv11 and RMHD muxer/demuxer

2018-04-22 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Hi, V3 drops the MLTI part, no idea how it survived 02fff499362daedcdcb0a9cdd517257843600563 on our side... Also dropped audio override, could not get a sample requiring it. Adapted to current HEAD. Thanks, Thilo ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list