Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer 
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.
> 
> I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> 
> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
>  suggestions

1 week passed
vote result:
Thilo  : YES
Jan Ekström: YES
Tobias Rapp: YES
Benoit Fouet   : YES
Nicolas George : YES
James Almer: YES
Ronald S. Bultje   : YES
Christophe Gisquet : YES
James Darnley  : NO
Annapoornima Koppad: YES
Peter Ross : YES
Michael Niedermayer: YES

patch applied

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-22 Thread Michael Niedermayer 
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.
> 
> I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> 

> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.

agree

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and
actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control.
Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and
actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-22 Thread Peter Ross 
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:10:39PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> > version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> > comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> > Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> > 
> > Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> > a vote.
> > 
> > I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> > 
> > Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> > we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
> >  suggestions
> 
> 3 days passed, 7 people casted a vote, 4 days left
> 
> Everyone please vote (unless you truely dont care either way)

I agree with the text.

-- Peter
(A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 AC40 DD6B)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-21 Thread Annapoornima Koppad 
I am voting for the code of conduct.

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:

> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last
> > version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further
> > comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> > Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> >
> > Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> > a vote.
> >
> > I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> >
> > Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> > we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
> >  suggestions
>
> 3 days passed, 7 people casted a vote, 4 days left
>
> Everyone please vote (unless you truely dont care either way)
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your
> own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>


-- 
Thanks and regards,
Annapoornima Koppad
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-21 Thread Michael Niedermayer 
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.
> 
> I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> 
> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
>  suggestions

3 days passed, 7 people casted a vote, 4 days left

Everyone please vote (unless you truely dont care either way)

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your
own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-21 Thread James Darnley 
On 2016-05-18 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.
> 
> I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> 
> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
>  suggestions

Who knows whether I get to vote.  Anyway...  I disagree on principle.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-20 Thread Christophe Gisquet 
Hi,

2016-05-18 20:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
>  suggestions

I agree to having a CoC.

This text is a first step, so I'm ok with it, but hoping it will be improved.

-- 
Christophe
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-19 Thread Michael Niedermayer 
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.
> 
> I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things
> 
> Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
> we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
>  suggestions

for completeness and as timothy asked
the vote will end 1 week after its start and a majority that is more
yes than no votes will be consiered as adopting the CoC

of course the vote committee can override or this
iam just stating something so we arent stuck

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-19 Thread Timothy Gu 
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
> version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
> comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
> Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.
> 
> Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
> a vote.

What are we looking for? A unanimous vote? ⅔ majority? ½? A vote can't be
formal if such basic mechanism is not defined.

Timothy
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

[FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

2016-05-18 Thread Michael Niedermayer 
This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last 
version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further 
comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this.
Everyone because it should be binding to everyone.

Kieran and Thilo asked for a formal vote and i agree that this needs
a vote.

I wanted to send this earlier, but was always busy with other things

Please state clearly if you agree to the text or if not.
we can extend and tune it later and do another vote if there are more
 suggestions

Thanks

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel