Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Correct opus-in-mp4 pre-skip to be uint16_t versus int16_t.

2018-08-23 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:58:13AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 8/21/2018 7:45 PM, Dale Curtis wrote: > > This field is a uint16_t, see docs: > > http://opus-codec.org/docs/opus_in_isobmff.html#4.3.2 > > > > Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis > > > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Correct opus-in-mp4 pre-skip to be uint16_t versus int16_t.

2018-08-21 Thread James Almer
On 8/21/2018 7:45 PM, Dale Curtis wrote: > This field is a uint16_t, see docs: > http://opus-codec.org/docs/opus_in_isobmff.html#4.3.2 > > Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis > > > 0001-Correct-opus-in-mp4-pre-skip-to-be-uint16_t-versus-i.patch > > > From 7f1588bc92ef4a70025aa140a8e660a36875c89c Mon

[FFmpeg-devel] Correct opus-in-mp4 pre-skip to be uint16_t versus int16_t.

2018-08-21 Thread Dale Curtis
This field is a uint16_t, see docs: http://opus-codec.org/docs/opus_in_isobmff.html#4.3.2 Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis From 7f1588bc92ef4a70025aa140a8e660a36875c89c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dale Curtis Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:42:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Correct opus-in-mp4 pre-skip to be