Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
On June 25, 2016 at 12:42:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer (mich...@niedermayer.cc)
wrote:

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
> >
> > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?
>
> both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af
> to keep the delta to libav smaller.

ok applied

thanks

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


The latest patch appears to work on my RPI3:

./ffmpeg  -f v4l2 -input_format yuv420p -framerate 25 -video_size 640x480
-i /dev/video0  -frames 500 -an   -c:v h264_omx test.mp4

Amancio
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
> > 
> > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?
> 
> both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af
> to keep the delta to libav smaller.

ok applied

thanks

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
> 
> is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?

both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af
to keep the delta to libav smaller.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> 
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> 
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is something preferred ?
> 
> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly

Anyone wants to write release notes ?
or shall we release without release notes ?

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User
questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML.
And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to 
> > test h264_omx?
> 
> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
> git fetch tmmi1
> git checkout -b omx

> git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130

applied


> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4

is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?


> 
> ./configure --enable-mmal --enable-omx-rpi --enable-omx
> make
> ./ffmpeg -i test.avi -an -c:v h264_omx test.mp4

Thanks for testing!


[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty

> On Jun 25, 2016, at 6:53 AM, Hendrik Leppkes  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber  wrote:
>> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>>> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
>>> test h264_omx?
>> 
>> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
>> git fetch tmmi1
>> git checkout -b omx
>> git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130
>> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
>> 
> 
> The first is only of a cosmetic nature and probably not required, the
> second is also slated to be merged from libav eventually:
> http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=commit;h=0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af
> 
> - Hendrik
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Just cloned  the latest ffmpeg and added Aman’s last patch.

git clone https://git.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git ffmpeg

https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
 


./configure --enable-mmal --enable-omx-rpi --enable-omx
make -j4


./ffmpeg  -f v4l2 -input_format yuv420p -framerate 25 -video_size 640x480 -i 
/dev/video0 -an   -c:v h264_omx test.mp4
I am getting:
DTS 140462626040094, next:1540 st:0 invalid dropping
PTS 140462626040094, next:1540 invalid dropping st:0
DTS 140462626080073, next:1544 st:0 invalid dropping
PTS 140462626080073, next:1544 invalid dropping st:0
…
The video seems to play okay on my macbook .

As far I am concerned , the warnings from ffmpeg are the last issue.


Amancio




___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber  wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
>> test h264_omx?
>
> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
> git fetch tmmi1
> git checkout -b omx
> git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130
> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
>

The first is only of a cosmetic nature and probably not required, the
second is also slated to be merged from libav eventually:
http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=commit;h=0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af

- Hendrik
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to 
> test h264_omx?

git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
git fetch tmmi1
git checkout -b omx
git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130
git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4

./configure --enable-mmal --enable-omx-rpi --enable-omx
make
./ffmpeg -i test.avi -an -c:v h264_omx test.mp4

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty

> On Jun 25, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Jan Gerber  wrote:
> 
> On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> where is that patch ?
>>> i see
>>> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi 
>>> [no]"
>>> in ffmpeg git, what is missing?
>> 
>> looking at tmm1/rebase-omx i only see 2 one line patches that we
>> dont have yet
>> i can certainly merge them before the release if thats all (but i have
>> no RPI so i cannot test)
>> 
>> is that all that is needed ? something else
>> missing that we should wait for ?
> 
> I can confirm that with those 2 commits -v:c h264_omx works on my Raspberry 
> Pi,
> while it fails without them.
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
> 

Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to 
test h264_omx?

Thanks!


___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> where is that patch ?
>> i see
>> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi 
>> [no]"
>> in ffmpeg git, what is missing?
> 
> looking at tmm1/rebase-omx i only see 2 one line patches that we
> dont have yet
> i can certainly merge them before the release if thats all (but i have
> no RPI so i cannot test)
> 
> is that all that is needed ? something else
> missing that we should wait for ?

I can confirm that with those 2 commits -v:c h264_omx works on my Raspberry Pi,
while it fails without them.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > 
> > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer 
> > >>>  wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >  Hi all
> >  
> >  what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> >  
> >  I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> >  Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> >  Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> >  
> >  Are there other suggestions?
> >  Is something preferred ?
> >  
> >  In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> > >>> 
> > >>> Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> > >>> Carl (Paul)
> > >>> Lorentz (Bodecs)
> > >>> fibonacci (Compn)
> > >>> [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> > >>> Hypatia (Kyle)
> > >>> 
> > >>> Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> > >>> Thus the winner is Laplace
> > >>> 
> > >>> i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> > >>> master unless people want me to wait ?
> > >>> 
> > >>> [...]
> > >>> 
> > >>> -- 
> > >>> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> > >>> 
> > >>> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> > >>> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin 
> > >>> Franklin
> > >>> ___
> > >>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > >>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > >>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> > >> 
> > >> Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding?
> > >> 
> > >> Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and
> > >> it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work…
> > > 
> > > we are 1 month behind shedule
> > > we make releases once about every 3 months
> > > 
> > > There is always a feature that will be finished next week or next
> > > 3 days. If you always wait you never release.
> > > 
> > > Also you didnt mention any timeframe for when this will be in git
> > > master
> > > 
> > > do you think its really better if we delay the release and maybe in
> > > 2 weeks have 5 new regressions that rewuire us to wait another
> > > month to get them fixed and then theres anoter big feature that comes
> > > the week after it and so on.
> > > IMHO better release now, and release soon again.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > -- 
> > > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> > > 
> > > Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and
> > > actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control.
> > > Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and
> > > actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.
> > > ___
> > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org 
> > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
> > > 
> > It really depends on your intent and what do you wish to provide with
> > your release. We will have to wait till Aman tells us what is his next step.
> 
> where is that patch ?
> i see
> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi 
> [no]"
> in ffmpeg git, what is missing?

looking at tmm1/rebase-omx i only see 2 one line patches that we
dont have yet
i can certainly merge them before the release if thats all (but i have
no RPI so i cannot test)

is that all that is needed ? something else
missing that we should wait for ?
Also keep in mind we will make a 3.1.1 maybe about 1-2 weeks after 3.1
that can include bugfixes for this

added aman gupta  to CC so this isnt missed ...

[...]


-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>  Hi all
>  
>  what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>  
>  I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>  Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
>  Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>  
>  Are there other suggestions?
>  Is something preferred ?
>  
>  In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> >>> 
> >>> Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> >>> Carl (Paul)
> >>> Lorentz (Bodecs)
> >>> fibonacci (Compn)
> >>> [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> >>> Hypatia (Kyle)
> >>> 
> >>> Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> >>> Thus the winner is Laplace
> >>> 
> >>> i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> >>> master unless people want me to wait ?
> >>> 
> >>> [...]
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> >>> 
> >>> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> >>> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
> >>> ___
> >>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> >>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> >>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >> 
> >> Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding?
> >> 
> >> Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and
> >> it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work…
> > 
> > we are 1 month behind shedule
> > we make releases once about every 3 months
> > 
> > There is always a feature that will be finished next week or next
> > 3 days. If you always wait you never release.
> > 
> > Also you didnt mention any timeframe for when this will be in git
> > master
> > 
> > do you think its really better if we delay the release and maybe in
> > 2 weeks have 5 new regressions that rewuire us to wait another
> > month to get them fixed and then theres anoter big feature that comes
> > the week after it and so on.
> > IMHO better release now, and release soon again.
> > 
> > [...]
> > -- 
> > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> > 
> > Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and
> > actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control.
> > Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and
> > actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.
> > ___
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org 
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
> > 
> It really depends on your intent and what do you wish to provide with
> your release. We will have to wait till Aman tells us what is his next step.

where is that patch ?
i see
" --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi [no]"
in ffmpeg git, what is missing?



> 
> With respect to RPI it has been over 2 years people have been waiting
> for hardware assist h264 encoding…
> 
> Cheers
> Amancio
> 
> 
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Amancio Hasty

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
 Hi all
 
 what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
 
 I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
 Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
 Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
 
 Are there other suggestions?
 Is something preferred ?
 
 In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
>>> 
>>> Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
>>> Carl (Paul)
>>> Lorentz (Bodecs)
>>> fibonacci (Compn)
>>> [list of people from june] (Gregory)
>>> Hypatia (Kyle)
>>> 
>>> Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
>>> Thus the winner is Laplace
>>> 
>>> i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
>>> master unless people want me to wait ?
>>> 
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>>> 
>>> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>>> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
>>> ___
>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>> 
>> Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding?
>> 
>> Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and
>> it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work…
> 
> we are 1 month behind shedule
> we make releases once about every 3 months
> 
> There is always a feature that will be finished next week or next
> 3 days. If you always wait you never release.
> 
> Also you didnt mention any timeframe for when this will be in git
> master
> 
> do you think its really better if we delay the release and maybe in
> 2 weeks have 5 new regressions that rewuire us to wait another
> month to get them fixed and then theres anoter big feature that comes
> the week after it and so on.
> IMHO better release now, and release soon again.
> 
> [...]
> -- 
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> 
> Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and
> actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control.
> Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and
> actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org 
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
> 
It really depends on your intent and what do you wish to provide with
your release. We will have to wait till Aman tells us what is his next step.

With respect to RPI it has been over 2 years people have been waiting
for hardware assist h264 encoding…

Cheers
Amancio


___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:12:05PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> >>
> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> >> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> >>
> >> Are there other suggestions?
> >> Is something preferred ?
> >>
> >> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> > 
> > Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> > Carl (Paul)
> > Lorentz (Bodecs)
> > fibonacci (Compn)
> > [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> > Hypatia (Kyle)
> > 
> > Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> > Thus the winner is Laplace
> > 
> > i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> > master unless people want me to wait ?
> 

> Rodger Combs still hasn't pushed his auto-bsf patchset.
> IMO at least a part of it should be applied for 3.1 to get rid of the
> memleak.

I agree, that shouldnt really cause any delay anyway ...
can someone please apply what should be applied from it.

thanks

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is
On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem).
On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number
of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >> 
> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> >> 
> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> >> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> >> 
> >> Are there other suggestions?
> >> Is something preferred ?
> >> 
> >> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> > 
> > Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> > Carl (Paul)
> > Lorentz (Bodecs)
> > fibonacci (Compn)
> > [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> > Hypatia (Kyle)
> > 
> > Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> > Thus the winner is Laplace
> > 
> > i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> > master unless people want me to wait ?
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > -- 
> > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> > 
> > Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> > temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
> > ___
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding?
> 
> Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and
> it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work…

we are 1 month behind shedule
we make releases once about every 3 months

There is always a feature that will be finished next week or next
3 days. If you always wait you never release.

Also you didnt mention any timeframe for when this will be in git
master

do you think its really better if we delay the release and maybe in
2 weeks have 5 new regressions that rewuire us to wait another
month to get them fixed and then theres anoter big feature that comes
the week after it and so on.
IMHO better release now, and release soon again.

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and
actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control.
Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and
actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread James Almer
On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>>
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
>> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>>
>> Are there other suggestions?
>> Is something preferred ?
>>
>> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> 
> Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> Carl (Paul)
> Lorentz (Bodecs)
> fibonacci (Compn)
> [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> Hypatia (Kyle)
> 
> Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> Thus the winner is Laplace
> 
> i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> master unless people want me to wait ?

Rodger Combs still hasn't pushed his auto-bsf patchset.
IMO at least a part of it should be applied for 3.1 to get rid of the
memleak.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Amancio Hasty

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer  
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>> 
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
>> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>> 
>> Are there other suggestions?
>> Is something preferred ?
>> 
>> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> 
> Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
> Carl (Paul)
> Lorentz (Bodecs)
> fibonacci (Compn)
> [list of people from june] (Gregory)
> Hypatia (Kyle)
> 
> Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
> Thus the winner is Laplace
> 
> i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
> master unless people want me to wait ?
> 
> [...]
> 
> -- 
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> 
> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding?

Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and
it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work…


Amancio

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> 
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> 
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is something preferred ?
> 
> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly

Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs)
Carl (Paul)
Lorentz (Bodecs)
fibonacci (Compn)
[list of people from june] (Gregory)
Hypatia (Kyle)

Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once
Thus the winner is Laplace

i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git
master unless people want me to wait ?

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Kyle Swanson
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Michael Niedermayer
 wrote:
> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, 
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is something preferred ?
>
> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>

Should probably be a mathematician since 3.1 is just about pi. There's
also been no FFmpeg version named after a woman. My suggestion is
`Hypatia.`[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Thanks,
Kyle
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Gregory J Wolfe
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf Of Wang Bin
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name
> 
> What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release
> month?

Don't want it to look like I'm trying to steal someone else's idea; I sent my 
suggestion in before I saw this reply.  GOOD IDEA!  See my later reply for 
suggestions!
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Gregory J Wolfe
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 5:01 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches  de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name
> 
> Hi all
> 
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> 
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
> 
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is something preferred ?
> 
> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
> 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
> 

Maybe to start a new tradition/policy, and since this will be sort of a June 
release, I googled famous scientists with birthdays in June.  Based on that 
here are some suggestions, with birthdays/summaries below:  Cassini, Crick, 
Stephenson, Paul, Cousteau, Maxwell, Coulomb, Rutan, Pascal, Turing, Kelvin, 
Mayer.  My pick  would be Rutan.

- June 8, 1625 Giovanni Cassini, French astronomer who discovered the moons of 
Saturn
- June 8, 1916 Francis Crick, British molecular biologist, physicist, and 
neuroscientist who co-discovered DNA structure
- June 9, 1781 George Stephenson, English inventor of the first steam 
locomotive engine for railroads
- June 9, 1915 Les Paul, American inventor who founded Les Paul guitar, and 
invented sound-on-sound, the eight-track recorder, over-dubbing, the electronic 
reverb effect, multi-track tape recording, and the Les Paul electric guitar
- June 11, 1910 Jacques-Yves Cousteau, French oceanic explorer who invented 
diving gear
- June 13, 1831 James Clerk Maxwell, Scottish physicist who discovered the 
electro-magnetic field
- June 14, 1736 Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, French physicist who wrote 
Coulomb's Law and invented the torsion balance
- June 17, - 1943 Burt Rutan, American aerospace engineer who invented light, 
strong, unusual-looking, energy-efficient aircraft designed Voyager first plane 
to fly around the world without stopping or refueling
- June 19, 1623 Blaise Pascal, French mathematician and physicist who invented 
an early calculator
- June 23, 1912 - Alan Turing, mathematician and computer theory pioneer, who 
invented the Turing Machine
- June 26, 1824 William Thomson Kelvin, British physicist who invented the 
Kelvin Scale
- June 28, 1906 - Maria Goeppert Mayer, American atomic physicist, who proposed 
the nuclear shell model of the atomic nucleus, Nobel Prize 1963

Greg Wolfe
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread compn
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:00:48 +0200
Michael Niedermayer  wrote:

> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> Are there other suggestions?

has fibonacci been used?

-compn
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Wang Bin
What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release month?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Bodecs Bela



2016.06.23. 23:23 keltezéssel, Paul B Mahol írta:

On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:

On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer 
wrote:


Hi all

what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?

I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
Galois, Viterbi, Darwin

Are there other suggestions?
Is something preferred ?

In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly

Thanks

--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. --
Aristotle

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel



Laplace.

Carl
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Lorentz or Laplace

And a suggestion for later times:  Heaviside

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside

best,

Bela
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:
> On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>>
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
>> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>>
>> Are there other suggestions?
>> Is something preferred ?
>>
>> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>>
>> No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. --
>> Aristotle
>>
>> ___
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>
>>
> Laplace.

Carl
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer 
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is something preferred ?
>
> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. --
> Aristotle
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>
Laplace.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


[FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all

what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?

I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, Galois, 
Viterbi, Darwin

Are there other suggestions?
Is something preferred ?

In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly

Thanks

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel