Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:44:34 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > That would be OpenJPEG. I have made quite a few contributions to > OpenJPEG. > > For a number of reason which I don't want to bore you with, I decided to >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:44:34 -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > That would be OpenJPEG. I have made quite a few contributions to OpenJPEG. > For a number of reason which I don't want to bore you with, I decided to > fork the project. Is that the code you are proposing to integrate? Then why doesn't

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:58:24AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Ismail Donmez wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > Hi Carl, > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Carl, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > In fact, I couldn't find many j2k issues in trac. > > I see too many: > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/query?status=!closed=~j2k > > > Does your codec take advantage of

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > In fact, I couldn't find many j2k issues in trac. I see too many: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/query?status=!closed=~j2k > Does your codec take advantage of multiple cores? Fortunately not: Since jpeg 2000 is an intra-only codec, using multiple cores to decode /

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Guys! As an act of goodwill, I just "closed" a j2k bug in trac. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4653#comment:6 Turns out this was a bug in openjpeg :) Kind Regards, Aaron On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: [...] > Does your codec take advantage of multiple cores? Or is it only single > threaded? ffmpeg -h decoder=jpeg2000 will answer your question [...] -- Clément B. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > clearly, you do not have the time, otherwise there > > would not be those issues in trac. > > Since this seems not clear to you: > Nearly all those issues are also reproducible

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > clearly, you do not have the time, otherwise there > would not be those issues in trac. Since this seems not clear to you: Nearly all those issues are also reproducible with Openjpeg, in addition some issues that are fixed in FFmpeg were still

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Ronald, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > > > Personally, I would recommend switching over to OpenJPEG: > > BSD 2 license, ISO reference implementation for standard, > > and large test suite. Rather than spending time on your native codec. >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Hendrik, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Hi Carl, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos > wrote: > > > >> Aaron Boxer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Hendrik, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Hi Hendrick > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Hendrik Leppkes > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 22,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos > wrote: > > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > > Aaron

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Carl, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > > > > Why don't you work on fixing the remaining issues with > > FFmpeg's implementation instead?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 22 March 2016 at 12:12, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hello, > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > If I were to integrate this into FFMpeg, would I then have to > re-release FFMpeg under Affero GPL ? > > FFmpeg already has a native JPEG2000 encoder and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Mar 22, 2016 8:59 AM, "Hendrik Leppkes" wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Hi Hendrick > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Hendrik Leppkes > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:44:34AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > > > > Why don't you work on

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Hendrick > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Hendrik Leppkes > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am developing a jpeg 2000

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Ismail, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Ismail Donmez wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Hi Carl, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos > wrote: > > > >> Aaron Boxer gmail.com>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Ismail Donmez
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: >> >> > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. >> >> Why don't you work on

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Hendrick On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > > If I were to integrate this into FFMpeg, would I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Carl, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes: > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > > Why don't you work on fixing the remaining issues with > FFmpeg's implementation instead? > That would

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hello, > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > If I were to integrate this into FFMpeg, would I then have to > re-release FFMpeg under Affero GPL ? > AGPL is evil, please keep it out of FFmpeg. -

[FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

2016-03-22 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hello, I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. If I were to integrate this into FFMpeg, would I then have to re-release FFMpeg under Affero GPL ? I don't like forks, but it looks like this is the only way to do this. Thanks, Aaron