On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:40 PM, compn wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:47:52 +0100
> wm4 wrote:
>
>> I don't think non-developers
>
> most of the list of people are developers of ffmpeg:
>
> http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=author&s=togni
> http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpe
On 24 November 2015 at 23:40, compn wrote:
> old developers have no right? is baptiste bad because he works on ffmbc?
> is roberto bad because he works on mplayer? are you bad because you work
> on mpv ? what makes a developer have rights or have no rights?
>
Most of those developers are not curr
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:47:52 +0100
wm4 wrote:
> I don't think non-developers
most of the list of people are developers of ffmpeg:
http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=author&s=togni
http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=author&s=Strasser
http://git.videol
I agree with both BBB and wm4.
You have to remember that when we made the committee back in September we
agreed to only include people who had more than 50 commits in the period of
a year. Therefore, if we include inactive people now, then they would be
out of the committee by next September becau
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Heres another suggested addition to the voting committee, i omitted
> the "[DECISSION]" from the subject as IIUC nicolas suggested to do it
> in a 2 step process, first check if anyone was missed and then do a
> actual
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:21:57 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Heres another suggested addition to the voting committee, i omitted
> the "[DECISSION]" from the subject as IIUC nicolas suggested to do it
> in a 2 step process, first check if anyone was missed and then do a
> actual [D
On 11/24/15, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Heres another suggested addition to the voting committee, i omitted
> the "[DECISSION]" from the subject as IIUC nicolas suggested to do it
> in a 2 step process, first check if anyone was missed and then do a
> actual [DECISSION] vote mail
>
>
Hi all
Heres another suggested addition to the voting committee, i omitted
the "[DECISSION]" from the subject as IIUC nicolas suggested to do it
in a 2 step process, first check if anyone was missed and then do a
actual [DECISSION] vote mail
I suggest to add people who do/did admin/provide ffmpeg
